STILLMORE, GA —
OSHA Inspection: CRIDER POULTRY CO., INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CRIDER POULTRY CO., INC. in 1 PLANT AVE, STILLMORE, GA 30464 (NAICS 311615). OSHA activity number 314091281.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CRIDER POULTRY CO., INC.
- Site address
- 1 PLANT AVE
- City
- STILLMORE
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30464
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 398, STILLMORE, GA 30464
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311615
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2015
- Employees
- 762
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
13 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 D03 IE
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2011
- Abate by
- Mar 2, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,675 · Current $3,273 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(E): Process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include the ventilation system design: a)Ammonia System Engine Room 2 area, on or about October 28, 2010, and at times prior to, the employer did not have the ventilation system design to ensure the ventilation system in place was adequate. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIREDATION
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3272.50
- — Z (S) $4675.00
1910.119 D03 II
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2011
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,675 · Current $3,273 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that the equipment in the process complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices: a)High Pressure Ammonia Receiver (HPR-1) located outside the Ammonia System Engine Room 2, on or about October 27, 2010, and at times prior to, the discharge to the atmosphere from the pressure relief devices did not comply with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practice (RAGAGEP) in that the discharge for the pressure relief devices (PSV01 and PSV02) was located approximately 9 feet, 2 inches above the platform, which is less than the required 15 feet per ANSI/IIAR 2-2008, Equipment, Design, and Installation of Closed- Circuit Ammonia Refrigerating Systems, Section 11.3.6.4. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS NOT REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3272.50
- — Z (S) $4675.00
1910.119 L05
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2011
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,675 · Current $3,273 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(5): Operating procedures were not updated accordingly when a change to the equipment in the covered process resulted in a change to the operating procedures: a)Ammonia System Engine Room 2 (Old Engine Room 3), on or about October 27, 2010, and at times prior to, the standard operating procedures (SOP's) for oil pots such as V-19 were not updated to reflect the new tag numbers. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS NOT REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3272.50
- — Z (S) $4675.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2011
- Abate by
- Mar 2, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by point of operation, rotating part(s), reciprocating part(s), or in-running nip point(s): a)Icehouse floor area, on or about October 21, 2010, and at times prior to, employees worked around and near a 15 X 15 inch, 24-foot metal floor trough with openings that were about 3.5 X 4.5 inches wide, the trough contained a rotating 9-inch scroll auger, which exposed employees to amputation, laceration and caught-in hazard. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION ARE REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4900.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2011
- Abate by
- May 31, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent), was not completed in the detail as required by the regulation: a)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2006, case number 01981110, injury date 1.24.2006, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.TION
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $700.00
- — Z (O) $1000.00
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2011
- Abate by
- May 31, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent), was not completed in the detail as required by the regulation: a)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2007, case number 01981260, injury date 4.27.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the injury or illness, parts of body affected, nor the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill. b)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2007, case number 01981304, injury date 8.17.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill. c)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2007, case number 01981319, injury date 9.12.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill. d)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2007, case number 01981345, injury date 10.22.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill. e)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2007, case number 01981350, injury date 10.24.2007, on or about October 21, 2010 the information at column (F) did not describe the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill. f)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2007, case number 01981373, injury date 12.10.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill. g)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2007, case number 01981376, injury date 11.27.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the object/substance that directl injured or made person ill. h)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2007, case number 01981378, injury date 12.25.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill. i)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2007, case number 01981380, injury date 12.17.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill. j)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2007, case number 01981382, injury date 12.26.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill. BATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.TION
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $700.00
- — Z (O) $1000.00
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2011
- Abate by
- May 31, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent), was not completed in the detail as required by the regulation: a)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2008, case number 01981385, injury date 1.3.2008, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the injury or illness. b)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2008, case number 01981386, injury date 1.03.2008, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill. c)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2008, case number 01981387, injury date 1.3.2008, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the injury or illness. d)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2008, case number 01981417, injury date 3.13.2008, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill. e)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2008, case number 01981422, injury date 3.25.2008, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the injury or illness, parts of body affected, nor the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill. f)For OSHA 300 Log calendar year 2008, case number 01981506, injury date 11.20.2008, on or about October 21, 2010, the information at column (F) did not describe the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.TION
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $700.00
- — Z (O) $1000.00
1904.29 B02
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2011
- Abate by
- May 31, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(2): An Incident Report (OSHA Form 301 or equivalent) for each work- related injury or illness, was not completed in detail as required by the regulation: a)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2006, case number 01981110, injury date 4.7.2006, on or about October 21, 2010, item 17 was not filled out in detail to explain what object or substance directly harmed the employee. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.TION
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $700.00
- — Z (O) $1000.00
1904.29 B02
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2011
- Abate by
- May 31, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(2): An Incident Report (OSHA Form 301 or equivalent) for each work- related injury or illness, was not completed in detail as required by the regulation: a)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2007, case number 01981260, injury date 4.27.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, item 17 was not filled out in detail to explain what object or substance directly harmed the employee. b)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2007, case number 01981304, injury date 8.17.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, item 14 and 17 were not filled out in detail to explain what was the employee doing just before the incident occurred and what object or substance directly harmed the employee. c)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2007, case number 01981319, injury date 9.12.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, item 14 and 17 were not filled out in detail to explain what was the employee doing just before the incident occurred and what object or substance directly harmed the employee. d)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2007, case number 01981345, injury date 10.22.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, item 17 was not filled out in detail to explain what object or substance directly harmed the employee. e)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2007, case number 01981350, injury date 10.24.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, item 17 was not filled out in detail to explain what object or substance directly harmed the employee. f)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2007, case number 01981373, injury date 12.10.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, item 14 and 17 were not filled out in detail to explain what was the employee doing just before the incident occurred and what object or substance directly harmed the employee. g)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2007, case number 01981376, injury date 11.27.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, item 14 and 17 were not filled out in detail to explain what was the employee doing just before the incident occurred and what object or substance directly harmed the employee. h)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2007, case number 01981378, injury date 12.25.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, item 14 and 17 were not filled out in detail to explain what was the employee doing just before the incident occurred and what object or substance directly harmed the employee. i)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2007, case number 01981380, injury date 12.17.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, item 17 was not filled out in detail to explain what object or substance directly harmed the employee. j)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2007, case number 01981382, injury date 12.26.2007, on or about October 21, 2010, item 17 was not filled out in detail to explain what object or substance directly harmed the employee. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.TION
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $700.00
- — Z (O) $1000.00
1904.29 B02
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2011
- Abate by
- May 31, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(2): An Incident Report (OSHA Form 301 or equivalent) for each work- related injury or illness, was not completed in detail as required by the regulation: a)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2008, case number 01981385, injury date 1.3.2008, on or about October 21, 2010, item 14 and 17 were not filled out in detail to explain what was the employee doing just before the incident occurred and what object or substance directly harmed the employee. b)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2008, case number 01981386, injury date 1.3.2008, on or about October 21, 2010, item 14 and 17 were not filled out in detail to explain what was the employee doing just before the incident occurred and what object or substance directly harmed the employee. c)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2008, case number 01981387, injury date 1.3.20088, on or about October 21, 2010, item 14, 16, and 17 were not filled out in detail to explain what was the employee doing just before the incident occurred, what was the injury or illness, and what object or substance directly harmed the employee. e)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2008, case number 01981417, injury date 3.13.2008, on or about October 21, 2010, item 17 was not filled out in detail to explain what object or substance directly harmed the employee. f)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2008, case number 01981422, injury date 3.25.2008, on or about October 21, 2010, item 16 was not filled out in detail to explain what was the injury or illness. h)For OSHA form 301 of calendar year 2008, case number 01981506, injury date 11.20.2008, on or about October 21, 2010, item 17 was not filled out in detail to explain what object or substance directly harmed the employee. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.TION
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $700.00
- — Z (O) $1000.00
1904.32 B03
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2011
- Abate by
- May 31, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(b)(3): A company executive did not certify that he or she had examined the OSHA 300 Log and that he or she reasonably believed that the annual summary was correct and complete: a)At the establishment, on or about October 21, 2010, the OSHA 300 Log of work- Related Injuries for 2006 was certified by an employee that was not a company executive. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.TION
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $700.00
- — Z (O) $1000.00
1904.32 B03
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2011
- Abate by
- May 31, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(b)(3): A company executive did not certify that he or she had examined the OSHA 300 Log and that he or she reasonably believed that the annual summary was correct and complete: a)At the establishment, on or about October 21, 2010, the OSHA 300 Log of Work-Related Injuries for 2007 was certified by an employee that was not a company executive. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED.TION
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $700.00
- — Z (O) $1000.00
1904.32 B03
- Issued
- Feb 4, 2011
- Abate by
- May 31, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.32(b)(3): A company executive did not certify that he or she had examined the OSHA 300 Log and that he or she reasonably believed that the annual summary was correct and complete: a)At the establishment, on or about October 21, 2010, the OSHA 300 Log of Work-Related Injuries for 2008 was not certified by a company executive. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION IS REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $700.00
- — Z (O) $1000.00
More inspections at Crider Poultry CO., INC.
View Crider Poultry CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311615)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 314091281.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.