EUSTACE, TX ·
OSHA Inspection: BENCHMARK INDUSTRIAL SVC(S) D/B/A WATERBLASTCO
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of BENCHMARK INDUSTRIAL SVC(S) D/B/A WATERBLASTCO in 16401 CR 2854, EUSTACE, TX 75124 (NAICS 237120). OSHA activity number 314179342.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BENCHMARK INDUSTRIAL SVC(S) D/B/A WATERBLASTCO
- Site address
- 16401 CR 2854
- City
- EUSTACE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75124
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 931, KILGORE, TX 75662
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237120
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1389
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2011
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $5,130 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer does not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from the recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees are exposed to fire, deflageration and explosion hazards: This violation most recently occurred on or about October 10, 2010, at the Eustace Gas Plant located at 16401 CR 2854, Eustace, Texas 75124, when the employer did not conduct a process hazard analysis to determine the fire and explosion provisions when vacuuming combustible dust from inside the quench tower; used a Vactor/Guzzler, 7600 vacuum truck (serial no. AM267) that was not equipped with fire protection and explosion prevention systems to collect combustible dust from inside the quench tower; and did not bond and ground the Vactor/Guzzler, 7600 vacuum truck (serial no. AM267) to prevent the accumulation of static electricity when vacuuming combustible dust from the inside of the quench tower, and exposed employees to fire, deflagration and explosion hazards. Among other methods, a feasible and acceptable method(s) to correct this hazard is (are) to comply with: NFPA 654, Standard for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids, 2006 edition which establishes requirements for all phases of the manufacturing, processing, blending, pneumatic conveying, repackaging, and handling of combustible particulate solids or hybrid mixtures, regardless of concentration or particle size, where the materials present a fire or explosion hazard; NFPA 655, Standard for Prevention of Sulfur Fire and Explosions, 2007 edition which establishes requirements to eliminate or reduce hazards of explosion and fire inherent in the processing and handling of sulfur; and/or NFPA 77, Recommended Practice on Static Electricity, 2007 edition which establishes recommended practices to identify, assess, and control static electricity for the purpose of preventing fires and explosions. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to establish, communicate and implement written procedures to ensure that a process hazard analysis is conducted to determine fire and explosion safety provisions when vacuuming combustible dust.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $5130.00
- · Z (S) $6300.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2011
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $5,130 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer does not furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazard of being struck-by or caught-between a rotating superstructure of a crane which is causing or is likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: This violations most recently occurred on or about October 10, 2010, at the Eustace Gas Plant located at 16401 CR 2854, Eustace, Texas 75124, when employees worked near a Grove, 14-ton, rough-terrain, hydraulic crane (serial #39227) that did not have control lines, warning lines, railings or similar barriers to mark the boundaries of the swing radius. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable methods to correct this hazard are comply with page 4 of the manufacturer's handbook which states, "SAFETY PRECAUTIONS, Never get on or off a machine in motion;" paragraph 5-3.2.1.5(a)(4) of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B30.5 - 2007, Mobile and Locomotive Cranes Safety Standard for Cableways, Cranes, Derricks, Hoists, Hooks, Jacks, and Slings which states, "The person directing the lift shall see that all persons are clear of the swing radius of the crane counterweight;" and/or, paragraph 4 on page 3 of the Construction Industry Manufacturers' Association, Crane Safety Manual for Users, Operators and Maintenance Personnel which states, "Be Sure there is adequate clearance for tail swing. Barricade the area to prevent entry..." Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit an abatement plan describing the actions it is taking to establish, communicate and implement written procedures to erect and maintain control lines, warning lines, railings or similar barriers to mark the boundaries of the swing radius of cranes.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $5130.00
- · Z (S) $6300.00
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Apr 6, 2011
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S) $4500.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237120)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 314179342.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.