Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WAYNECO, INCORPORATED

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of WAYNECO, INCORPORATED in 800 HANOVER ROAD, YORK, PA 17408 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 314244757.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Wayneco, Incorporated — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Wayneco, Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
800 HANOVER ROAD
City
YORK
State
PA
ZIP
17408
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
SIC code (legacy)
2434
Employees
30
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing health.

11 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 05 4 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jun 9, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,785 Reduced

Hazardous substances E200W103

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to severe burn injuries from the hazard of fire and explosion
of wood dust from
the lack of isolation devices and bonding and grounding equipment:
(a)Wayneco, Incorporated - The fine sanding Scientific dust collector unit
was not
equipped with isolation devices to prevent fires and deflagrations from
propagating from the dust collector back through the inlet ductwork to the
woodworking equipment, or through the ductwork recycling exhausted air back
into the building, on or about March 31, 2011.
(b)Wayneco, Incorporated - The main Pneumafil dust collector unit was not
equipped with isolation devices to prevent fires and deflagrations from
propagating from the dust collector back through the inlet ductwork to the
woodworking equipment, or through the ductwork recycling exhausted air back
into the building, on or about March 31, 2011.
(c)Wayneco, Incorporated - The relay system Scientific dust collector unit
was not
equipped with isolation devices to prevent fires and deflagrations from
propagating from the dust collector back through the inlet ductwork to the
woodworking equipment, or through the ductwork recycling exhausted air back
into the building, on or about March 31, 2011.
(d)Wayneco, Incorporated - The ductwork was not bonded and grounded for
woodworking equipment, such as the table saw and automated belt sander, on
or
about March 31, 2011.
ABATEMENT NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to
correct these hazards includes following the National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA)
664, Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Explosions in Wood
Processing and
Woodworking Facilities, 2007 Edition, including, but not limited to:
Provide permanent
grounding and bonding of production equipment to control the accumulation
of static
electric charge (NFPA 664, Chapter 7, Section 7.9.2);  Isolate conveying
systems with
fire and deflagration hazards to prevent propagation of fire and
deflagration both
upstream and downstream into occupied areas or other critical process
equipment (NFPA
664, Chapter 8, Section 8.2.4.1).  Examples of isolation methods include
mechanical
isolation (such as rotary airlock valves), chemical isolation (discharge
of a chemical
extinguishing agent into interconnecting pipe or duct), and flame front
diverters (such as
backblast dampers and high-speed abort gates).  NFPA 664, Chapter 8,
Section
8.2.2.2.1.8 states that ductwork shall be bonded and grounded in
accordance with
7.9.2(1) which states that where equipment is subject to the accumulation
of static
charge, the accumulation of static electric charge shall be controlled by
one of the
following:  (1)  Permanent grounding and bonding of production equipment.
All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use by
a competentengineer or other technically qualified person.  (Ninety (90)
day progress reports are
required during the abatement period.)
*STEP 1
Submit to the Area Director a written, detailed plan of abatement
outlining a schedule
for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to
control
employee exposure to hazardous substances referenced in this citation:
1.Evaluation of engineering/administrative control options.
2.Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design.
3.Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures;
and
4.Acceptance or modification/redesign of controls.
*STEP 2
Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible
engineering upon
verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance.
Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:STEP - 1 - 09/08/11
Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:STEP - 2 - 06/09/12
VERIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1785.00
  • — Z (S) $2380.00

1910.22 A02

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jul 10, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,338 Reduced

Hazardous substances E200W103

Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1337.50
  • — Z (S) $1785.00

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jul 10, 2011

Hazardous substances E200W103

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jul 10, 2011

Hazardous substances E200W103

1910.147 C04 IIB

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Aug 9, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,338 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1337.50
  • — Z (S) $1785.00

1910.147 C05 I

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jun 10, 2011

1910.147 C06 II

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Aug 9, 2011

1910.147 C07 IIIB

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jul 10, 2011

1910.147 C07 IV

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jul 10, 2011

1910.107 B05 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jul 10, 2011

Hazardous substances E109259000400440

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 7, 2011
Abate by
Jul 10, 2011

View Wayneco, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 314244757.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.