LANCASTER, PA —
OSHA Inspection: G.G. SCHMITT & SONS, INCORPORATED
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of G.G. SCHMITT & SONS, INCORPORATED in 2821 OLD TREE DRIVE, LANCASTER, PA 17603 (NAICS 332510). OSHA activity number 314245473.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- G.G. SCHMITT & SONS, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 2821 OLD TREE DRIVE
- City
- LANCASTER
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 17603
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332510
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3429
- Employees
- 26
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
17 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 14, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,020 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fire and explosion hazards from combustible metal dusts: (a)Polishing Room - The Polishing Room had a Hammond DusKolector, model DK- 8, serial number 16449, dry-type dust collector, which collected combustible aluminum dust generated by the polishing of aluminum tubing on equipment, such as the Hammond sander, model 3-ROL-B, serial number 10736, equipped with a sanding belt on the left side and a polishing wheel on the right side. This aluminum dust collection system had the following deficiencies, on or about May 3, 2011: (1) The employer had the Hammond DusKolector, model DK-8, serial number 16449, dry-type dust collector located inside the building. (2) This dust collector did not have deflagration venting. (3) This dust collector did not have any barriers or other means of protection for personnel from flash fire or shrapnel in the event of explosion. (4) Ribbed, flexible, non-metallic ductwork connected the Hammond sander, model 3-ROL-B, serial number 10736, which generated combustible aluminum dust, to the Hammond DusKolector, model DK-8, serial number 16449, dry-type dust collector. This ductwork would allow the combustible aluminum dust to accumulate on interior surfaces, and the non- metallic material of which the ductwork consisted would allow for the accumulation of static charges. (5) This dust collector did not get emptied at least once per day. (6) When employees emptied the combustible aluminum dust from the dust collector, they did not mix the combustible aluminum dust with an inert material (five parts inert material to one part aluminum dust), but rather just disposed of the combustible aluminum dust in a dumpster, where the dust commingled with various other wastes. (7) This dry-type dust collector recycled air back into the Polishing Room. (b)Polishing Room - The facility had a dry-type dust collection system, which collected combustible stainless steel dust generated by the polishing and buffing of stainless steel tubing. This dust collection system, located outside of the building, had the following deficiencies, on or about May 3, 2011: (1) This dust collection system did not have sufficient suction nor capture velocity as evidenced by the excessive accumulations of combustible metal dust throughout the Polishing Room. (2) The dust collector did not have deflagration venting. (3) This dust collector did not have any barriers or other means of protection for personnel from flash fire or shrapnel in the event of explosion. (4) Dust-laden air flowed through the blower (fan) after leaving the cyclone and going to the baghouses. (5) Ribbed, flexible, non-metallic ductwork connected the buffing and polishing equipment, which generated combustible stainless steel dust, to the main ductwork of the system. The ribbed, flexible, non-metallic ductwork would allow the combustible stainless steel dust to accumulate on interior surfaces, and the non-metallic material of which the duct consisted would allow for the accumulation of static charges. (6) This dust collector did not get emptied at least once per day. (7) This dry-type dust collection system recycled air back into thebuilding. (c)Polishing Room ! Buffing and polishing of aluminum tubing and stainless steel tubing generated combustible metal dusts, and the room had an automatic sprinkler system, on or about May 3, 2011. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard includes following National Fire Protection Association NFPA 484, Standard for Combustible Metals, 2009 Edition, including, but not limited to: *Locate dry-type dust collectors, used to collect combustible aluminum dust, outside of buildings (NFPA 484 Chapter 6, Section 6.3.2.5). *Provide deflagration vents on dry collectors, used to collect combustible aluminum dust (NFPA 484, Chapter 6, Section 6.3.5.6). *Provide dry-type dust collectors, used to collect combustible aluminum dust, with barriers or other means for protection of personnel (NFPA 484, Chapter 6, Section 6.3.2.5.2). *Construct ducts on dust collection systems, used to collect combustible aluminum dust, only of conductive material fabricated and assembled with smooth interior surfaces and with internal lap joints facing the direction of airflow (NFPA 484, Chapter 6, Section 6.3.3.5.1), and also bond and ground duct systems, dust collectors, and dust-producing machinery to minimize accumulation of static electric charge (NFPA 484, Chapter 6, Section 6.3.3.6). *Remove combustible aluminum dust from dry collectors at least once each day and at more frequent intervals if conditions warrant (NFPA 484, Chapter 6, Section 6.3.5.5), and mix the combustible aluminum dust waste with an inert material in a volume ratio of five parts inert material to one part metal dust (NFPA 484, Chapter 6, Section 6.3.5.5.3). *Do not recycle air from dry-dust collectors, used to collect combustible aluminum dust, into buildings (NFPA 484, Chapter 6, Section 6.3.6). *Provide each machine that produces combustible stainless steel dust with hoods, capture devices, or enclosures connected to a dust collection system that has sufficient suction and capture velocity to collect and transport all the dust produced (NFPA 484, Chapter 12, Section 12.2.1.1). *Provide deflagration vents on dry collectors, used to collect combustible stainless steel dust (NFPA 484, Chapter 12, Section 12.2.10.7). *Provide dry-type dust collectors, used to collect combustible stainless steel dust, with barriers or other means for protection of personnel (NFPA 484, Chapter 12,Section 12.2.1.5). *Locate the blower for drawing the dust-laden air into the stainless steel dust collector on the clean-air side of the collector (NFPA 484, Chapter 12, Section 12.2.10.12). *Construct ducts on dust collection systems, used to collect combustible stainless steel dust, only of conductive material fabricated and assembled with smooth interior surfaces and with internal lap joints facing the direction of airflow (NFPA 484, Chapter 12, Section 12.2.5.6), and also bond and ground duct systems, dust collectors, and dust-producing machinery to minimize accumulation of static electric charge (NFPA 484, Chapter 12, Section 12.2.5.10). *Remove combustible stainless steel dust from dry collectors at least once each day and at more frequent intervals if conditions warrant (NFPA 484, Chapter 12, Section 12.2.10.6). *Do not recycle air from dry-dust collectors, used to collect combustible stainless steel dust, into buildings (NFPA 484, Chapter 12, Section 12.2.11). *Do not install automatic sprinkler systems in area where combustible metals are produced or handled (NFPA 484, Chapter 13, Section 13.3.1.1). Abatement certification required within 10 days after abatement date. The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, date and method of abatement, and states employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $2020.00
- — I (S) $2020.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,820 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1820.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2011
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.145 C03
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,820 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1820.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.147 C05 IIB
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2011
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2011
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.147 D
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2011
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.176 A
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,820 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1820.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.178 L03 III
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2011
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,115 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2115.00
- — Z (S) $2800.00
1910.217 D09 I
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,820 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1820.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.217 D09 IV
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2011
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.219 F01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,115 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2115.00
- — Z (S) $2800.00
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,590 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1590.00
- — Z (S) $2100.00
1910.1026 D01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2011
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.1026 L01
- Issued
- Aug 5, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 14, 2011
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at G.G. Schmitt & Sons, Incorporated
View G.G. Schmitt & Sons, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332510)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 314245473.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.