LITTLE ROCK, AR —
OSHA Inspection: GREG FORD CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GREG FORD CONSTRUCTION in CHENAL PARKWAY, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 314489014.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GREG FORD CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- CHENAL PARKWAY
- City
- LITTLE ROCK
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72211
- Mailing
- 10999 GOODWIN RD, BENTON, AR 72015
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237110
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1623
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2010
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: On or about May 19, 2010 and at times prior thereto, with respect to the jobsite on Chenal Parkway in Little Rock, Arkansas where employees were installing a drop inlet on a storm sewer main. Employees were observed working in a cordoned area inside an active roadway and were not wearing high visibility garments. This practice created conditions which exposed the employees to the hazard of being struck by moving vehicles. Among other methods, one feasible means of abatement to correct this hazard is to follow Chapter 6D, Pedestrian and Worker Safety, as delineated in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2003 Edition, and use high visibility apparel. No abatement certification or documentation is required for this violation.ion
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2010
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $450 · Current $270 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $270.00
- — Z (S) $450.00
1926.651 C02
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2010
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.652 A01
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2010
- Abate by
- Jul 5, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237110)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 314489014.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.