SINCLAIR, WY —
OSHA Inspection: SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING COMPANY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING COMPANY in 100 EAST LINCOLN HIGHWAY, SINCLAIR, WY 82334 (NAICS 324110). OSHA activity number 314511064.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING COMPANY
- Site address
- 100 EAST LINCOLN HIGHWAY
- City
- SINCLAIR
- State
- WY
- ZIP
- 82334
- Mailing
- P O BOX 277, SINCLAIR, WY 82334
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- Yes
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 324110
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2911
- Employees
- 360
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 E03 III
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $7000.00
General-duty citation text
1910.119(e)(3)(iii)* Process hazard analysis. The process hazard analysis shall address: Engineering and administrative controls applicable to the hazards and their interrelationships such as appropriate application of detection methodologies to provide early warning of releases. (Acceptable detection methods might include process monitoring and control instrumentation with alarms, and detection hardware such as hydrocarbon sensors.): Process hazard analysis that were previously conducted did not address engineering and administrative controls associated with problems with pump 8P-145 in LPG area in the Alky Unit that vented to atmosphere and controlling LEL.
Recent events (3)
- — I (S) $7000.00
- — P (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.119 E03 VI
- Issued
- Abate by
General-duty citation text
1910.119(e)(3)(vi)* Process hazard analysis. The process hazard analysis shall address: Human factors: Prior process hazard analysis's that were conducted did not address human factors associated with pump 8P-145 venting to atmosphere in worker area. Employer did not ensure employees had an adequate amount of time needed or protection to complete all steps associated with trying to vent pump to atmosphere (get adequate suction for pump 8P-145).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.119 F01 IIIB
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $7000.00
General-duty citation text
1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(B)* Operating procedures. The employer shall develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and shall address at least the following elements. Safety and health considerations: Precautions necessary to prevent exposure, including engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment: The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities associated with safety and health considerations (precautions necessary to prevent exposure, including engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment) when venting pump to atmosphere. The employer had not developed an operating procedure to specifically address the hazards with pump (bullet pump 8P-145) that placed employees at risk when pumping when trying to get suction.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.119 F04
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $4250.00 · Current $4250.00
General-duty citation text
1910.119(f)(4)* The employer shall develop and implement safe work practices to provide for the control of hazards during operations such as lockout/tagout; confined space entry; opening process equipment or piping; and control over entrance into a facility by maintenance, contractor, laboratory, or other support personnel. These safe work practices shall apply to employees and contractor employees: The employer developed, but failed to properly implement hot work procedures/safe work practices. Attendants were not maintaining an accurate count of authorized entrants (Not all entrants were signing out on permits and attendant did not sign entrants out once work complete and entrants no longer in permitted confined spaces. Ancillary Reference: 1910.146(i)(3)* Duties of attendants. The employer shall ensure that each attendant: Continuously maintains an accurate count of authorized entrants in the permit space and ensures that the means used to identify authorized entrants under paragraph (f)(4) of this section accurately identifies who is in the permit space:
Recent events (3)
- — I (S) $4250.00
- — P (S) $4250.00
- — Z (S) $4250.00
1910.119 G01 I
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $7000.00
General-duty citation text
1910.119(g)(1)(i)* Training. Initial training. Each employee presently involved in operating a process, and each employee before being involved in operating a newly assigned process, shall be trained in an overview of the process and in the operating procedures as specified in paragraph (f) of this section. The training shall include emphasis on the specific safety and health hazards, emergency operations including shutdown, and safe work practices applicable to the employee's job tasks: Employees involved in running pump (bullet pump 8P-145) had not been trained in procedures to protect themselves from venting pump to atmosphere (nor had employer developed operating procedure for this task) that addressed the specific safety and health hazards associated with venting pump to atmosphere.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.119 G03
- Issued
- Abate by
General-duty citation text
1910.119(g)(3)* Training documentation. The employer shall ascertain that each employee involved in operating a process has received and understood the training required by this paragraph. The employer shall prepare a record which contains the identity of the employee, the date of training, and the means used to verify that the employee understood the training: The employer did not ascertain that each employee involved in venting pump 8P-145 had received proper training. The employer had not prepared a record which contained the identity of the employees, the date of training, and the means used to verify that the employees understood the training or that training conducted was adequate for task associated with pump 8P-145.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.119 J04 II
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $7000.00
General-duty citation text
1910.119(j)(4)(ii)* Inspection and testing. Inspection and testing procedures shall follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices: LPG Bullet pressure vessels not being inspected following recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices identified in API Standard 653. Tanks/vessels were not being inspected within 10 years of initial placement into service. Ancillary Reference: API Standard 653, 4th Edition, April 2009. 6.1 General - Periodic in- service inspection of tanks shall be performed as defined herein. The purpose of this inspection is to assure continued tank integrity. 6.4.4.4 Internal inspection is primarily required to do as follows. c) Identify and evaluate any tank bottom settlement. 6.4.2.1 The interval from initial service until the initial internal inspection shall not exceed 10 years.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.119 J05
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $7000.00
General-duty citation text
1910.119(j)(5)* Mechanical integrity. Equipment deficiencies. The employer shall correct deficiencies in equipment that are outside acceptable limits (defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of this section) before further use or in a safe and timely manner when necessary means are taken to assure safe operation: The employer did not correct pump deficiencies identified by engineering when an engineering work flow process was conducted to redesign and engineer pump and no interim controls established to protect employees when venting LPG pump (8P-145) in Alky Unit that was outside of the acceptable limits with current procedures. Employees vented pump to atmosphere due to lack of suction and employer was aware of past issues with pump and failed to take appropriate action to prevent the incident that occurred on May 25, 2012.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.119 L01
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $7000.00
General-duty citation text
1910.119(l)(1)* Management of change. The employer shall establish and implement written procedures to manage changes (except for "replacements in kind") to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures; and, changes to facilities that affect a covered process: The employer failed to complete MOC's before making changes to processes or equipment (2011 Emergency Eyewash Stations and Safety Showers Procedures updated (changed monthly inspections to weekly), a new type of emergency eye wash/shower stations were being installed, & block valves were installed near level bridle in Alky Unit associated with installation of temporary Sour Water System) that affected the covered processes in the Alky Unit.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.151 B
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00 · Current $7000.00
General-duty citation text
1910.151(b)* In the absence of an infirmary, clinic, or hospital in near proximity to the workplace which is used for the treatment of all injured employees, a person or persons shall be adequately trained to render first aid. Adequate first aid supplies shall be readily available: 1. Adequate first aid supplies were not available (burn cream). Employees were burned in a flash fire and required burn cream and supply had been previously depleted from the previous catastrophe and not restocked. No management took appropriate steps to restock supply burn cream or ensure others restocked after previous incident. 2. No emergency care was available/within in the critical minutes (3 - 4 minutes from the workplace where employees were flashed/burned) between the occurrence of the flash fire and the availability of person adequately trained to render first aid, physician(s), or hospital care for the injured employees.s),
Recent events (3)
- — I (S) $7000.00
- — P (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $7000.00
General-duty citation text
1910.151(c)* Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body shall be provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: Suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not always available or provided in the Alky Unit for immediate emergency use: 1. Employees eyes that could be exposed to injurious corrosive materials could not access suitable portable eye wash units for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes due to steam spraying in the direction of emergency portable eye station at the KOH. 2. Emergency shower was not immediately available in LPG Storage Area (not functioning) for use after a fire incident or when working around caustics in LPG (KOH area) in Alky unit. Employees were unable to use the closest emergency shower after being sprayed with LPG product that ignited and flashed/burned employees. Closest emergency shower unit was at the other end of LPG Storage Area (employees would be more than 10 seconds from emergency unit and would have to cross through LPG to reach working emergency shower. 3. Portable emergency eye wash unit was not being inspected weekly (inadvertently omitted per safety department). Ancillary Reference: American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z358.1-1998, Emergency showers shall be in accessible locations that require no more than 10 seconds to reach and should be within a travel distance no greater than 30.5 meters (100 feet) from the hazard. Emergency Eyewash and Shower Equipment, which states, at section 7.4.4, that eyewash facilities are to be located to require no more than 10 seconds to reach but that where a strong acid or caustic is used, the unit should be immediately adjacent to the hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.157 C04
- Issued
- Abate by
General-duty citation text
1910.157(c)(4)* The employer shall assure that portable fire extinguishers are maintained in a fully charged and operable condition and kept in their designated places at all times except during use: Fire extinguisher had been discharged after an incident and not immediately replaced, removed from site, or tagged.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING COMPANY
SINCLAIR, WY—2018-08-27 00:00:00
SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING COMPANY
SINCLAIR, WY—2015-07-16 00:00:00
SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING COMPANY
SINCLAIR, WY—2015-07-02 00:00:00
SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING COMPANY
SINCLAIR, WY—2015-06-24 00:00:00
SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING COMPANY
SINCLAIR, WY—2014-08-12 00:00:00
SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING COMPANY
View SINCLAIR WYOMING REFINING COMPANY's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 324110)
EL SEGUNDO, CA—2026-06-30
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
EL SEGUNDO, CA—2026-06-30
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
TRAINER, PA—2026-06-26
MONROE ENERGY, LLC
RICHMOND, CA—2026-06-17
CHEVRON U.S.A. INC.
WILMINGTON, CA—2026-06-10
MARATHON LOS ANGELES REFINERY - WILMINGTON
More inspections in WY
CHEYENNE, WY—2026-07-08
PRIDE ROOFING AND CONSTRUCTION
CHEYENNE, WY—2026-07-07
SAPP BROS
CHEYENNE, WY—2026-06-29
PALACIOS ROOFING
LOVELL, WY—2026-06-25
GEORGIA PACIFIC GYPSUM, LLC
CHEYENNE, WY—2026-06-19
RAMOS ROOFING
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 314511064.