Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HY-TECH TRUCK & TRAILER MFG, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HY-TECH TRUCK & TRAILER MFG, LLC in 2550 E. BIJOU AVENUE, FORT MORGAN, CO 80701 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 314662412.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Hy-Tech Truck & Trailer MFG, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Hy-Tech Truck & Trailer MFG, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2550 E. BIJOU AVENUE
City
FORT MORGAN
State
CO
ZIP
80701
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
SIC code (legacy)
3449
Employees
24
Ownership type
A

18 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employees were exposed to crushing and struck-by hazards:
(a)Hy-Tech Truck & Trailer Mfg, LLC & 2550 E. Bijou Ave., Fort Morgan,
CO 80701: On and before 1/11/11, the employer did not ensure that personnel
involved in moving material with the use of the overhead cranes were
instructed in the safe use of under-the-hook rigging equipment. Employees
are
using rigging equipment to move material that weighs in excess of 4000 lbs
that is involved in the construction of frac trailers.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard
is to follow ASME/ANSI B30.9-1971 requirements associated with conforming
to the
following practices involving the use of rigging:
(a)Determine weight of load
(b)Select a sling of suitable rated capacity
(c)Use the proper hitch
(d)Guide loads with a tag line when practical
(e)When using multiple leg slings select the longest sling possible so as
to reduce
the tension in the sling legs
(f)Examine the sling for damaged or worn area
(g)Attach the sling securely to the load
(h)Pad or protect any sharp corners the sling is in contact with
(i)Center the load in the base (bowl) of the hook to prevent hook point
loading
(j)Avoid any kinks, loops, or twist in the legs
(k)Keep hands and fingers from between the sling and the load
(m)Start lift slowly to avoid shock loading the sling
(n)Do not pull a sling from under a load when the load is resting on the
sling.
Block the load up to remove the sling.
(o)Do not shorten a sling by knotting, by wire rope clips, or by any other
means
(p)Do not inspect a sling by passing bare hands over the body. Broken
wires, if
present, may puncture the hands.
(q)Keep the sling well lubricated in order to prevent corrosion.
(b)Hy-Tech Truck & Trailer Mfg, LLC & 2550 E. Bijou Ave., Fort Morgan,
CO 80701: On and before 1/11/11, the employer did not ensure the spreader
beam assembly or below-the-hook lifting device was designed by or under the
direct supervision of a qualified person. The design shall be in accordance
with ASME BTH-1 and shall consider the stresses resulting from the
application of rated load plus the weight of the device. The condition
exposed
employees using the lifting device to struck-by and crushing hazards as a
result
of the lifting device failing.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method can be
found in the
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME B30.20-1.2.2 Construction,
"Structural
and mechanical lifting devices shall be designed to ASME BTH-1 Design
Category B (static
strength criteria) selected for its number of load cycles, unless a
qualified person representing
the owner, purchaser, or user of the lifting device determines and can
demonstrate that
ASME BTH-1 Design Category A is appropriate.
Design Category A shall only be designated when the magnitude and
variation of loads
applied to the lifter are predictable and do not exceed the rated
capacity, where the loading
and environmental conditions are accurately defined, service is not
severe, and the
ancticipated load cycles do not exceed Service Class 0.
(c)Hy-Tech Truck & Trailer Mfg, LLC & 2550 E. Bijou Ave., Fort Morgan,
CO 80701: On and before 1/11/11, the employer did not ensure the spreader
beam assembly or below-the-hook lifting device was rated prior to initial
use.
The spreader beam assembly was utilized to lift 4,000 lb wall assembly
units
for frac trailers and did not have the rated load visibly marked or
identification
affixed listing the manufacturer's name and address, serial number and
lifting
device weight.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method can be
found in the
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME B30.20-Below-The-Hook
Lifting
Devices, section 20-1.2.1 Marking, Rated Load-All new structural and
mechanical lifting
devices shall be marked with, but not limited to, the following
information:
(1)manufacturer's name and address
(2)serial number
(3)lifter weight, if over 100 lb
(4)cold current (amps)(when applicable)
(5)rated voltage (when applicable)
(6)rated load
(7)ASME BTH-1 Design Category(8)ASME BTH-1 Service Class
Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for
this item (See
enclosed "Abatement Certification Letter").tion
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520.00
  • — Z (S) $4200.00

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2160.00
  • — Z (S) $3600.00

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.179 J03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520.00
  • — Z (S) $4200.00

1910.179 J02 III

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.179 M01

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.179 G02 II

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.184 D

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2160.00
  • — Z (S) $3600.00

1910.243 C03

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440.00
  • — Z (S) $2400.00

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,080 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1080.00
  • — Z (S) $1800.00

1910.254 B04 IV

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $1,080 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1080.00
  • — Z (S) $1800.00

1910.254 D09 III

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.303 B01

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2160.00
  • — Z (S) $3600.00

1910.303 F

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.305 B01

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,440 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1440.00
  • — Z (S) $2400.00

1910.305 B02

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 27, 2011
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.253 B02 IV

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2011
Abate by
Jul 6, 2011
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

View Hy-Tech Truck & Trailer MFG, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 314662412.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.