Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: RAGOZZINO FOOD, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RAGOZZINO FOOD, INC. in 10 AMES AVENUE, MERIDEN, CT 06451 (NAICS 311412). OSHA activity number 314715152.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ragozzino Food, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ragozzino Food, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10 AMES AVENUE
City
MERIDEN
State
CT
ZIP
06451
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311412
SIC code (legacy)
2038
Employees
20
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 05 10 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Feb 1, 2011
Abate by
Mar 6, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,125 · Current $563 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and
utilized for the
control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in
activities covered by
this section:
Production Dept. - The employer did not develop specific energy control
procedures for
equipment, such as but not limited to the chiller systems using ammonia,
that fall under this
standard to bring all energy sources to a zero level.s
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $562.50
  • · Z (S) $1125.00

1910.147 F02 I

Serious Gravity 05 2 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Feb 1, 2011
Abate by
Mar 6, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,125 · Current $563 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(2)(i): When outside personnel were engaged in
activities covered by the
scope and application of the standard, the onsite employer and the outside
employer did not
inform each other of their respective lockout or tagout procedures:
Production Dept. - The employer did not consult with their outside vendor
to confirm that a
specific lockout/tagout procedure was developed and implement when the
vendor was performing
maintenance on their Sauce Room Chiller System or their Ames Spiral
Freezer System.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $562.50
  • · Z (S) $1125.00

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 1, 2011
Abate by
Jun 6, 2011
Penalty
Initial $900 · Current $450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or
maintain at the
workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the
criteria specified
in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:
Production Dept. - The employer did not develop a written hazard
communication program
describing how the specific program elements in sections (f), (g) and (h)
of this standard will
be accomplished.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $450.00
  • · Z (S) $900.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 314715152.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.