MERIDEN, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: RAGOZZINO FOOD, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of RAGOZZINO FOOD, INC. in 10 AMES AVENUE, MERIDEN, CT 06451 (NAICS 311412). OSHA activity number 314715152.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RAGOZZINO FOOD, INC.
- Site address
- 10 AMES AVENUE
- City
- MERIDEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06451
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311412
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2038
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2011
- Abate by
- Mar 6, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,125 · Current $563 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section: Production Dept. - The employer did not develop specific energy control procedures for equipment, such as but not limited to the chiller systems using ammonia, that fall under this standard to bring all energy sources to a zero level.s
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $562.50
- · Z (S) $1125.00
1910.147 F02 I
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2011
- Abate by
- Mar 6, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,125 · Current $563 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(2)(i): When outside personnel were engaged in activities covered by the scope and application of the standard, the onsite employer and the outside employer did not inform each other of their respective lockout or tagout procedures: Production Dept. - The employer did not consult with their outside vendor to confirm that a specific lockout/tagout procedure was developed and implement when the vendor was performing maintenance on their Sauce Room Chiller System or their Ames Spiral Freezer System.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $562.50
- · Z (S) $1125.00
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 1, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $900 · Current $450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Production Dept. - The employer did not develop a written hazard communication program describing how the specific program elements in sections (f), (g) and (h) of this standard will be accomplished.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $450.00
- · Z (S) $900.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311412)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 314715152.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.