BAYOU SORREL, LA —
OSHA Inspection: ESTIS WELL SERVICE, LLC
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of ESTIS WELL SERVICE, LLC in RIG #23 FROG LAKE FIELD, BAYOU SORREL, LA 70764 (NAICS 213111). OSHA activity number 314769597.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ESTIS WELL SERVICE, LLC
- Site address
- RIG #23 FROG LAKE FIELD
- City
- BAYOU SORREL
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70764
- Mailing
- 1414 GRAND PRAIRIE RD., NEW IBERIA, LA 70560
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 213111
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1381
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety & Health Act of 1970. The employer do es not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which are free fro m recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious physic al harm to employees in that employees are exposed to the hazards of fire and ex plosion: On or about March 9, 2011, and at times prior thereto, the employer did not erect an emergency escape line (Geronimo Line) with a properly installed em ergency escape device at Rig # 23. This would trap employees on the working plat form during an emergency, exposing employees to the hazard of fire and explosion . Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct t his hazard would be the installation of a properly rigged and secured emergency descent or other satisfactory auxiliary means of egress, such as specified in Se ction 6, Sub-Section 6.10 Paragraph 6.10.1 of the American Petroleum Institute ( API) RP54-99, Third Edition, August 1999. Essential elements of this procedure would include: 1.Stak ing out a securely anchored one-half inch wire rope escape line attached to the derrick or mast so as to provide a ready and convenient means of escape from the Derrickman's working platform. 2. The escape line route is to be kept clear of obstructions. 3. A safety device is to be provided to permit fast emergency exit from the Derrickman's working platform to a safe place. 4. The tension on the e scape line is to be periodically checked and adjusted to assure a safe landing a nd to allow the Derrickman to stop twenty (20) to twenty-five (25) feet from the anchor point. 5. The ground anchor point of the escape line is to be located a minimum lateral distance from the derrick or mast equal to the height above grou nd level to the point where the escape line is fastened. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. 1 903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation describing the actions it is taking to establ ish, communicate, and implement written procedures to ensure all well service ri gs under their control are equipped with emergency egress from working platforms on the rig. The documentation will also address how the employer will ensure th at employees are not exposed to this hazard while working on rigs that are owned or controlled by other companies.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4900
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety & Health Act of 1970. The employer do es not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which are free fro m recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious physic al harm in that the employees are exposed to hazards of being crushed or struck- by a tipping well servicing rig: On or about March 9, 2011, and at times prior t hereto, the employer did not ensure that a workover rig used by employees during a well service operation was set up and maintained in a condition that would prevent it from tipping. The em ployer did not set up the rig in accordance with the manufacturer's operation ma nual and where the manufacturer's instruction were not available did not use ind ustry recognized practice to determine a safe guying pattern for Rig #23. Also, the barge used as the foundation for Rig #23 took on water allowing the rig to b ecome off level when water filled the barge compartment. Both of these condition s exposed employees to hazards associated with a tipping well service rig. Among other feasible methods to correct the identified hazard, one method would be to assure the workover rig is rigged up in a safe manner in accordance with the ma nufacturer's operation manual or by using American Petroleum Institutes (API) Recommended Practice 54-99, Third Edition, August 1999, Recommended Practice for Occupational Safety for Oil and Gas Well Drilling and Servicing Operations, sec tion 6.3, Preliminary Rig-Up Operations and Recommended Practice 4G, Recommended Practice for Use and Procedures for Inspection, Maintenance, and Repair of Dril ling and Well Servicing Structures, section 13.3, Guy wire End Terminations and Hardware. In cases where the manufacture instruction or the API does not fit the employers rig installation need, a safe alternative would be to hire a third pa rty engineer to approve a safe guying pattern. Additionally, when barges are use d as a foundation for a workover rig, they are to be maintained so that they kee p the derrick level by using permanent repairs to fix leaking compartments. Purs uant to 29 C.F.R. 1903.19, within ten (10) calendar days of the abatement date, the employer must submit documentation describing the actions it is taking to establish, communicate, and implement written procedures to ensure all well serv ice rigs under their control are rigged up and maintained in a manner that will prevent the crushing and struck-by hazards associated with the tipping of those rigs. The documentation will also address how the employer will ensure that empl oyees are not exposed to this hazard while working on rigs that are owned or con trolled by other companies
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
1910.146 C04
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $4900
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.151 B
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $0 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4900
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $49,000 · Current $7,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000
- — Z (W) $49000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 213111)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 314769597.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.