LAS VEGAS, NV —
OSHA Inspection: VEGAS BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of VEGAS BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY in 4375 SOUTH VALLEY VIEW BLVD., SUITE G, LAS VEGAS, NV 89103 (NAICS 493110). OSHA activity number 314889601.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VEGAS BAR & RESTAURANT SUPPLY
- Site address
- 4375 SOUTH VALLEY VIEW BLVD., SUITE G
- City
- LAS VEGAS
- State
- NV
- ZIP
- 89103
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 493110
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4226
- Employees
- 39
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
618037501
- Issued
- May 2, 2011
- Abate by
- May 19, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Nevada Revised Statute 618.375(1): Every employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees, as follows: a)In the shipping and receiving sections of the warehouse, the employer did not ensure that all storage racks displayed in one or more conspicuous places a plaque indicating the maximum permissible unit load and/or maximum uniformly distributed load per level, the average unit load if applicable, and the maximum total load per bay. ABATEMENT: A reasonable means of abatement would be to follow American National Standard Institute MH16.1:2008 as follows: 1.4.2 Plaque - The owner is responsible for displaying in one or more conspicuous locations a permanent plaque(s). Each plaque shall have an area of not less than 50 square inches. Plaques shall show in clear, legible print (a) the maximum permissible unit load and/or maximum uniformly distributed load per level, (b) the average unit load (PL Average, see Section 2.6.2) if applicable and (c) maximum total load per bay. The unit load is usually a single pallet or container ind its contents mechanically transported. Storage levels having multiple stacking of unit loads shall be so identified. It is the responsibility of the owner to ensure that the rack system is not altered so that the plaque information is invalidated. b) In the shipping and receiving sections of the warehouse, the employer did not ensure that all storage racks were regularly inspected for damage. Racks CV2-0-23 and CV4-02- 23 had noticeable damage from being hit with a lift truck; an unmarked support rack, near the maraschino cherries, had significant damage to it; the storage rack near the opening between the shipping and receiving sections of the warehouse was bent. ABATEMENT: A reasonable means of abatement would be to follow American National Standard Institute MH16.1:2008 as follows: 1.4.1 Owner Maintenance (2): Regularly inspect for damage. If damage is found, immediately unload the affected area and replace or repair any damaged columns, beams or other structural components. 1.4.9 Rack Damage: Upon visible damage, the pertinent portions of the rack shall be unloaded immediately by the user until the damaged portion is repaired or replaced.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2520.00
- — Z (S) $4200.00
618037501
- Issued
- May 2, 2011
- Abate by
- May 5, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,570 · Current $2,142 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Nevada Revised Statute 618.375(1): Duties of employers. The employer failed to furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees: The employer did not ensure a safe place of employment and a place of employment which was free from reognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees, as follows: a) In the receiving and shipping sections of the warehouse, employees were allowed to operate a Hyster Ordermaster powered industrial truck without an effective personal fall arrest system in place. 1. The employer had allowed the employees to operate the Hyster lift with a Madaco Tuff-Shox 6 foot lanyard with a shock-absorber. Employees could work up to approximately 20 feet in the air with the Hyster lift. If the employees worked at a lower height and fell off the lift, the employee could hit the ground. The employees were exposed to serious injury due to not using the proper lanyard with the personal fall arrest system as required by the manufacturer. ABATEMENT: A reasonable means of abatement would be to follow the manufacturer's operating manual as follows: Page 23, Warning: The operator MUST ALWAYS wear the tetherline and safety harness when operting the lift truck. The tetherline is specially made to lessen the shock of a fall and help prevent injury to the operator. Make sure the tetherline is installed before operating the lift truck. Page 50: Warning: The tetherline is specially made to lessen the shock of a fall. Do not substitue other types of rope. 2. The employer had allowed the employees to operate a Hyster Ordermaster powered industrial truck with a Madaco Tuff-Belt personal fall arrest harness that was damaged. The snaphook attached to the Hyster lift was bent. The other snaphook was missing a pin, which made the snaphook stick when it was opened. The adjustable leg strap was cut, and chest strap had small holes in it. ABATEMENT: A reasonable means of abatement would be to follow the manufacturer's operating manual as follows: Pafe 50 2.: Inspect the safety harness for cracks, cuts or wear.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2142.00
- — Z (S) $3570.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- May 2, 2011
- Abate by
- May 5, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- May 2, 2011
- Abate by
- May 5, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2520.00
- — Z (S) $4200.00
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- May 2, 2011
- Abate by
- May 19, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,940 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2940.00
- — Z (S) $4900.00
1910.303 G01 IB
- Issued
- May 2, 2011
- Abate by
- May 6, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1260.00
- — Z (S) $2100.00
1904.32 A01
- Issued
- May 2, 2011
- Abate by
- May 19, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $420.00
- — Z (O) $700.00
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- May 2, 2011
- Abate by
- May 19, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $420.00
- — Z (O) $700.00
618037601
- Issued
- May 2, 2011
- Abate by
- May 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $420.00
- — Z (O) $700.00
618038301
- Issued
- May 2, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $420.00
- — Z (O) $700.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 493110)
More inspections in NV
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 314889601.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.