OLD MONROE, MO —
OSHA Inspection: MISSOURI SCRAP & RECYCLING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MISSOURI SCRAP & RECYCLING in 211 NORTH MAIN STREET, OLD MONROE, MO 63369 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 315249342.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MISSOURI SCRAP & RECYCLING
- Site address
- 211 NORTH MAIN STREET
- City
- OLD MONROE
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63369
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423930
- SIC code (legacy)
- 5093
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
22 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the potential hazard of being struck-by suspended loads: a/ At the yard, frequent inspections of the five-point grapple attached to the Fuchs MHL331 Terex Wheeled Material Handler were not performed. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to perform thorough frequent inspections of these mechanical lifting devices as required by ASME B30.20-2003, paragraph 20-1-3.3. DISCLAIMER: a/ The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/ The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.ON
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960.00
- — Z (S) $2800.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the potential hazard of being struck by a suspended load: a/ At the yard, periodic inspections of the five-point grapple attached to the Fuchs MHL331 Terex Wheeled Material Handler were not performed. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to perform thorough periodic inspections of these mechanical lifting devices as required by ASME B30.20-2003, paragraph 20-1-3.4. DISCLAIMER: a/ The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/ The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.ON
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the potential hazard of being struck by a suspended load: a/ At the yard, dated inspection records for the five-point grapple attached to the Fuchs MHL331 Terex Wheeled Material Handler were not available. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to perform thorough frequent inspections of these mechanical lifting devices as required by ASME B30.20-2003, paragraph 20-1-3.6. DISCLAIMER: a/ The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/ The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.ON
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the potential hazard of being struck by a suspended load: a/ At the yard, the five point grapple attached to the Fuchs MHL331 Terex Wheeled Material Handler was observed leaking substantial amounts of hydraulic fluid. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to perform thorough frequent inspections of these mechanical lifting devices as required by ASME B30.20-2003, paragraph 20-1-3.7. DISCLAIMER: a/ The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/ The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.ON
1910.106 E02 II
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,470 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1470.00
- — Z (S) $2100.00
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
1910.157 D04
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960.00
- — Z (S) $2800.00
1910.147 C06 I
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
1910.147 C07 IA
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
1910.215 A02
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960.00
- — Z (S) $2800.00
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960.00
- — Z (S) $2800.00
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,960 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1960.00
- — Z (S) $2800.00
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
1910.305 G01 IVD
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
1910.334 A02 I
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
1910.36 G02
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Mar 29, 2011
- Abate by
- May 13, 2011
More inspections at Missouri Scrap & Recycling
View Missouri Scrap & Recycling's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423930)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 315249342.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.