Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SMITHFIELD PACKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED

Accident-driven inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven health inspection of SMITHFIELD PACKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED in 424 E RAILROAD ST, CLINTON, NC 28328 (NAICS 311611). OSHA activity number 315452789.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Smithfield Packing Company, Incorporated — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Smithfield Packing Company, Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
424 E RAILROAD ST
City
CLINTON
State
NC
ZIP
28328
Mailing
P. O. BOX 49, CLINTON, NC 28329
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311611
SIC code (legacy)
2011
Employees
1500
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing health.

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 D01 III

Willful 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $70,000 · Current $70,000
Recent events (2)
  • — I (W) $70000.00
  • — Z (W) $70000.00

1910.1200 H03 I

Willful 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2012
Abate by
Sep 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $70,000 · Current $70,000
Recent events (2)
  • — I (W) $70000.00
  • — Z (W) $70000.00

1910.1200 H03 III

Willful 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2012
Abate by
Sep 7, 2012
Penalty
Initial $70,000
Recent events (2)
  • — I (W)
  • — Z (W) $70000.00

95012901

Serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2012
Abate by
Sep 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:  The
employer did not furnish each of his employees conditions of employment
and
a place of employment free
from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in
that employees were exposed to struck by hazards from vehicular traffic:
a)facility, wastewater - employees preparing tankers for loading were in
the path of semi-tanker
trucks backing into the loading area or from the unexpected movement, in
any direction, of the
tanker truck.
ABATEMENT NOTE:
1)Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct these hazards
is to require an observer or spotter to safely direct semi-tanker trucks
being backed into the
loading area.  Develop and implement procedures for employees serving as
spotters for
drivers, to include where they will stand and how they will communicate
with drivers (e.g.,
verbal, hand signals, flags, etc.)
2)Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct these hazards
is to develop and implement a program to ensure any movement by tanker
trucks only be made
under the positive control of Smithfield Packing Company employees.  This
program may
include such items as tanker key control, wheel locking devices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6300.00
  • — Z (S) $6300.00

95012901

Serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $4,500 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:  The
employer did not furnish each of his employees conditions of employment
and a place of employment free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious
physical harm to employees in that
employees were exposed to: fall from height and struck by vehicular
traffic:
a)wastewater facility, loading area  - where the employer failed to
provide adequate lighting in the
loading area for employees who access the top of semi-tanker trailers to
unload sludge from the
overhead storage tanks, where the lighting ranged from 0.01 - 2.6 foot
candles.
b)main facility, yard - where the employer failed to provide adequate
lighting in the rear of the
building where employees who walked between the plant and rendering and
casings buildings
were exposed to vehicular traffic, and the lighting ranged from 0.01 - 2.6
foot candles.
Reference:American National Standard Practice for Industrial Lighting
Standard (ANSI), (A11.1-1965),
table 1, pages 10-11.
Feasible abatement methods, among others, to correct this hazard are, but
not limited to:
a)Install additional fixed lighting to provide adequate lighting in
accordance with ANSI.
1.building exterior, pedestrian minimum requirement of 5 foot candles.
2.building exterior, catwalks minimum requirement of 2 foot candles.
3.building exterior, material handling minimum requirement of 20 foot
candles.
4.building exterior, roadways between or along buildings minimum
requirement of 1 foot candle.
b)Ensure a regular scheduled system of maintenance to clean the lights.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4500.00
  • — Z (S) $6300.00

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $1,950 · Current $1,950
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:  The
employer did not furnish each of his employees conditions of employment
and a place of employment free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious
physical harm to employees in that
employees were exposed to fall from height to a hard surface:
a)McGill facility - an employee who accessed the top of a semi-tanker
trailer to take air
monitoring samples who was exposed to a ten foot fall to a hard surface
was not provided fall
protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1950.00
  • — Z (S) $1950.00

1910.132 A

Serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,250 · Current $3,250
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3250.00
  • — Z (S) $3250.00

1910.133 A01

Serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $2400.00

1910.151 C

Serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $2400.00

1910.242 B

Serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,550 · Current $4,550
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4550.00
  • — Z (S) $4550.00

1910.23 A08 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.1026 D02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2012
Abate by
Sep 28, 2012
Penalty
Initial $975 · Current $975

Hazardous substances 0685

Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $975.00
  • — Z (O) $975.00

1910.1026 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012

Hazardous substances 0685

Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.1026 J02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 13, 2012
Abate by
Aug 16, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

View Smithfield Packing Company, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 315452789.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.