CLINTON, NC —
OSHA Inspection: SMITHFIELD PACKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Accident-driven inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven health inspection of SMITHFIELD PACKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED in 424 E RAILROAD ST, CLINTON, NC 28328 (NAICS 311611). OSHA activity number 315452789.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SMITHFIELD PACKING COMPANY, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 424 E RAILROAD ST
- City
- CLINTON
- State
- NC
- ZIP
- 28328
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 49, CLINTON, NC 28329
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311611
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2011
- Employees
- 1500
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing health.
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $70,000
Recent events (2)
- — I (W) $70000.00
- — Z (W) $70000.00
1910.1200 H03 I
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $70,000
Recent events (2)
- — I (W) $70000.00
- — Z (W) $70000.00
1910.1200 H03 III
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000
Recent events (2)
- — I (W)
- — Z (W) $70000.00
95012901
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $6,300
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck by hazards from vehicular traffic: a)facility, wastewater - employees preparing tankers for loading were in the path of semi-tanker trucks backing into the loading area or from the unexpected movement, in any direction, of the tanker truck. ABATEMENT NOTE: 1)Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct these hazards is to require an observer or spotter to safely direct semi-tanker trucks being backed into the loading area. Develop and implement procedures for employees serving as spotters for drivers, to include where they will stand and how they will communicate with drivers (e.g., verbal, hand signals, flags, etc.) 2)Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct these hazards is to develop and implement a program to ensure any movement by tanker trucks only be made under the positive control of Smithfield Packing Company employees. This program may include such items as tanker key control, wheel locking devices.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $6300.00
- — Z (S) $6300.00
95012901
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $4,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: fall from height and struck by vehicular traffic: a)wastewater facility, loading area - where the employer failed to provide adequate lighting in the loading area for employees who access the top of semi-tanker trailers to unload sludge from the overhead storage tanks, where the lighting ranged from 0.01 - 2.6 foot candles. b)main facility, yard - where the employer failed to provide adequate lighting in the rear of the building where employees who walked between the plant and rendering and casings buildings were exposed to vehicular traffic, and the lighting ranged from 0.01 - 2.6 foot candles. Reference:American National Standard Practice for Industrial Lighting Standard (ANSI), (A11.1-1965), table 1, pages 10-11. Feasible abatement methods, among others, to correct this hazard are, but not limited to: a)Install additional fixed lighting to provide adequate lighting in accordance with ANSI. 1.building exterior, pedestrian minimum requirement of 5 foot candles. 2.building exterior, catwalks minimum requirement of 2 foot candles. 3.building exterior, material handling minimum requirement of 20 foot candles. 4.building exterior, roadways between or along buildings minimum requirement of 1 foot candle. b)Ensure a regular scheduled system of maintenance to clean the lights.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4500.00
- — Z (S) $6300.00
95012901
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,950 · Current $1,950
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall from height to a hard surface: a)McGill facility - an employee who accessed the top of a semi-tanker trailer to take air monitoring samples who was exposed to a ten foot fall to a hard surface was not provided fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1950.00
- — Z (S) $1950.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,250 · Current $3,250
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3250.00
- — Z (S) $3250.00
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $2400.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $2400.00
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,550 · Current $4,550
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4550.00
- — Z (S) $4550.00
1910.23 A08 II
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2012
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.1026 D02 I
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $975 · Current $975
0685
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $975.00
- — Z (O) $975.00
1910.1026 H01
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2012
0685
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.1026 J02 II
- Issued
- Aug 13, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 16, 2012
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Smithfield Packing Company, Incorporated
View Smithfield Packing Company, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311611)
More inspections in NC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 315452789.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.