DAYTON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: THE DAYTON FORGING AND HEAT TREATING COMPANY
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of THE DAYTON FORGING AND HEAT TREATING COMPANY in 215 NORTH FINDLAY ST., DAYTON, OH 45402 (NAICS 332111). OSHA activity number 315496356.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE DAYTON FORGING AND HEAT TREATING COMPANY
- Site address
- 215 NORTH FINDLAY ST.
- City
- DAYTON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45402
- Mailing
- 215 NORTH FINDLAY ST., DAYTON, OH 45401
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332111
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3462
- Employees
- 90
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
15 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,370 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: a) In Building #3, Heat Treat, an employee was using a bar tong, a below-the-hook lifting device in conjunction with a bridge crane to lift metal roll stock onto a furnace cart and was exposed to a falling part and struck-by hazard due to an unknown rated load capacity and lack of periodic inspection of the tong. b) In Building #3, Heat Treat, an employee was using an "umbrella", a below-the-hook lifting device in conjunction with a overhead bridge crane to lift numerous metal roll stock into an induction furnace and was exposed to falling part and struck-by hazard due to an unknown rated load capacity and lack of periodic inspection of the "umbrella" lifting device. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to follow the guidelines in American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B30.20-2003, Section 20-1.2.1 wherein it specifies that below-the-hook lifting devices must be capable of lifting loads within its rated capacity, which must be marked so as to inform the user to prevent overloading and failure of the device. The employer can also determine during the periodic inspection of these devices that the rated load capacity is marked and used within its rated load capacity
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1370.00
- — Z (S) $2975.00
1910.22 B01
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $2380.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,370 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1370.00
- — Z (S) $2380.00
1910.212 A05
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $2380.00
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785 · Current $1,370 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1370.00
- — Z (S) $1785.00
1910.305 G02 II
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,785
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $1785.00
1910.332 B01
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,975 · Current $1,370 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1370.00
- — Z (S) $2975.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $1,370 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1370.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.146 C01
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,370 · Current $1,370
1910.146 D14
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 26, 2011
1910.146 E01
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2011
1910.24 H
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $5,600 · Current $1,370 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1370.00
- — Z (R) $5600.00
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $1,370 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1370.00
- — Z (R) $7000.00
1910.184 E01
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2011
1910.184 H05 I
- Issued
- Jun 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 28, 2011
More inspections at The Dayton Forging and Heat Treating Company
View The Dayton Forging and Heat Treating Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332111)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 315496356.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.