BALLWIN, MO ·
OSHA Inspection: AUTO TIRE
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AUTO TIRE in 14943 MANCHESTER ROAD, BALLWIN, MO 63011 (NAICS 811111). OSHA activity number 315653071.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AUTO TIRE
- Site address
- 14943 MANCHESTER ROAD
- City
- BALLWIN
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63011
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811111
- SIC code (legacy)
- 7538
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
24 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the potential hazard of being crushed by a automotive lift: a/ Inside the shop area, operators of the Rotary Single-Post In-Ground Hydraulic Lift located in Bays #2 and #3 were not instructed in the safety requirements for the safe operation, inspection, and maintenance through the use of the manufacturer's provided instructions. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to perform operator training through the use of the manufacturer's provided instructions as required by ANSI/ALI ALOIM-2008, Standard for Automotive Lifts, paragraph 4.2.1. DISCLAIMER: a/ The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/ The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.ON
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3500.00
- · Z (S) $5000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the potential hazard of being crushed by a automotive lift: a/ Inside the shop area, operators of the Rotary Single-Post In-Ground Hydraulic Lift located in Bays #2 and #3 were not provided with the manufacturer's operating instructions for these systems. Warning labels were not installed on either lift. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to provide the manufacturer's operating instructions and posting warning labels as required by ANSI/ALI ALOIM-2008, Standard for Automotive Lifts, paragraph 4.2.2. DISCLAIMER: a/ The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/ The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.ON
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the potential hazard of being crushed by a automotive lift: a/ Inside the shop area, operator training for the Rotary Single-Post In-Ground Hydraulic Lift located in Bays #2 and #3 was not documented. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to document operator training as required by ANSI/ALI ALOIM-2008, Standard for Automotive Lifts, paragraph 4.3. DISCLAIMER: a/ The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/ The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.ON
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the potential hazard of being crushed by a automotive lift: a/ Inside the shop area, documentation that periodic inspections of the Rotary Single-Post In-Ground Hydraulic Lift located in Bays #2 and #3 were not prepared or maintained. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to document the periodic inspections as required by ANSI/ALI ALOIM-2008, Standard for Automotive Lifts, paragraph 5.4. DISCLAIMER: a/ The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/ The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.ON
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the potential hazard of being crushed by a automotive lift: a/ Inside the shop area, safe load limit signs belonging to the Rotary Single-Post In-Ground Hydraulic Lift located in Bays #2 and #3 were not posted. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to post the safe load limit signs as required by ANSI/ALI ALOIM-2008, Standard for Automotive Lifts, paragraph 5.6.2.5. DISCLAIMER: a/ The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b/ The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.ON
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,800 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2800.00
- · Z (S) $4000.00
1910.22 D01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
1910.176 C
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
1910.36 G02
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,800 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2800.00
- · Z (S) $4000.00
1910.101 B
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,800 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2800.00
- · Z (S) $4000.00
1910.132 D01 I
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,800 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2800.00
- · Z (S) $4000.00
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
1910.132 F04
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $6,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4200.00
- · Z (S) $6000.00
1910.136 A
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $6,000 · Current $4,200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $4200.00
- · Z (S) $6000.00
1910.145 F05
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3500.00
- · Z (S) $5000.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
1910.169 B03 IV
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,800 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2800.00
- · Z (S) $4000.00
1910.252 A02 VII
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,800 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2800.00
- · Z (S) $4000.00
1910.252 B03
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
1910.253 B02 II
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
1910.304 G05
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 26, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,000 · Current $2,800 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2800.00
- · Z (S) $4000.00
1910.334 A02 II
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
1910.147 C07 IV
- Issued
- Aug 23, 2011
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2011
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811111)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 315653071.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.