FRONTENAC, KS —
OSHA Inspection: SUGAR CREEK PACKING COMPANY, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SUGAR CREEK PACKING COMPANY, INC. in 1600 W. MCKAY, FRONTENAC, KS 66763 (NAICS 311612). OSHA activity number 316036458.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SUGAR CREEK PACKING COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 1600 W. MCKAY
- City
- FRONTENAC
- State
- KS
- ZIP
- 66763
- Mailing
- 4360 CREEK RD., CINCINNATI, OH 45241
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311612
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2013
- Employees
- 438
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 E05
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5): The employer did not establish a system to communicate the actions to be taken, as a result of the process hazard analysis team's recommendations, to operating, maintenance and other employees whose work assignments are in the process and who could be affected by the recommendations actions: At the establishment, the employer did not communicate all the findings and recommendations of the 2002 Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) initial study, and the 2007 Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) revalidation study to the Ammonia Department employees such as, but not limited to, all operators, technicians, maintenance employees, and hazardous chemical release responders. Employees were exposed to catastrophic release of ammonia which results in asphyxiation, explosion and flash fire leading to death and injury to persons in and near the facility. 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1) requires certification and documentation that the abatement of the above violation is completed.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $4900.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.119 F01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for safety conducting activities in each covered process consistent with the process safety information and which addressed the elements listed in 29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i) through (f)(1)(iv): At the establishment, the employer did not develop and implement a written operating procedure or task procedure with clear instructions related to the emergency shutdown buttons (ESB) located on the outside of the engine room. Employees were exposed to catastrophic release of ammonia which results in asphyxiation, explosion and flash fire leading to death and injury to persons in and near the facility. 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1) requires certification and documentation that the abatement of the above violation is completed.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $4900.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.119 F01 ID
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(i)(D): The employer's written operating procedures covering the steps for each operating phase did not address emergency shutdown including the conditions under which emergency shutdown is required, and the assignment of shutdown responsibility to qualified operators to ensure that emergency shutdown in a safe and timely manner: At the establishment, all of the operating procedures for ammonia process equipment including but not limited to the SOP BC-16-01-LT Operation of Booster (Low Stage) Compressor; SOP PC-16-53-HT - Primary (High Stage) Compressor; SOP BC-16-02-LT Operation of Booster (Low Stage) Compressor; SOP BC-17-06-LT Operation of Booster (Low Stage) Compressor; EC-19-01-HT Operation of Evaporative Condenser; EV-01-10-HT Operation of Process Temperature Control Evaporator did not include any revision to explain how to determine when it is safe to enter the engine room or what personal protective equipment to wear before entering to isolate and purge leaking equipment. Employees were exposed to catastrophic release of ammonia which results in asphyxiation, explosion and flash fire leading to death and injury to persons in and near the facility. 29 CFR 1903.19(c)(2) abatement of the above violation was verified at the time of inspection. No certification is required.tion
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.119 F01 IV
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Jul 16, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iv): The employer's written operating procedures did not address requirements for the safety systems and their functions: At the establishment, at the time of inspection, the current written operating procedures including but not limited to the SOP BC-16-01-LT Operation of Booster (Low Stage) Compressor; SOP PC-16-53-HT - Primary (High Stage) Compressor; SOP BC-16-02-LT Operation of Booster (Low Stage) Compressor; SOP BC-17-06-LT Operation of Booster (Low Stage) Compressor; EC-19-01-HT Operation of Evaporative Condenser; EV-01-10-HT Operation of Process Temperature Control Evaporator did not address the function of safety systems such as: emergency stop buttons, isolation devices (King Valves), water spray systems, and emergency backup power. Employees were exposed to catastrophic release of ammonia which results in asphyxiation, explosion and flash fire leading to death and injury to persons in and near the facility. 29 CFR 1903.19(c)(2) abatement of the above violation was verified at the time of inspection. No certification is required.tion
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $4900.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.119 G01 I
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(g)(1)(i): The employer did not train each employee, before being involved in operating a newly assigned process, in an overview of the process and in the operating procedures as specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(f): At the establishment, the employer did not provide training to the Ammonia Department employees such as, but not limited to, all operators, technicians, maintenance employees, and hazardous chemical release responders regarding specific safety and health hazards, emergency operations to include shut down and safe work practices related to their assigned duties and responsibilities. Employees have not received the required knowledge, skills, and abilities including but not limited to the training on the facility specific operating procedures such as but not limited to the SOP BC-16-01-LT Operation of Booster (Low Stage) Compressor; SOP PC- 16-53-HT - Primary (High Stage) Compressor; SOP BC-16-02-LT Operation of Booster (Low Stage) Compressor; SOP BC-17-06-LT Operation of Booster (Low Stage) Compressor; EC-19- 01-HT Operation of Evaporative Condenser; EV-01-10-HT Operation of Process Temperature Control Evaporator. Employees were exposed to catastrophic release of ammonia which results in asphyxiation, explosion and flash fire leading to death and injury to persons in and near the facility. 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1) requires certification and documentation that the abatement of the above violation is completed.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $4900.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.119 J02
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Aug 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish and implement written procedures to maintain the on-going mechanical integrity of process equipment: At the establishment, the employer did not establish, develop and implement the detail procedures for the repair of process equipment to maintain the ongoing integrity of equipment including but not limited to the pressure vessels, storage tanks, valves, controls, compressors, pumps, and safety systems. These procedures shall include material and spare parts control, authorizations and approval for repairs, detail and clear steps to accomplish for repairing or replacing equipment, frequency of replacement, employee training and qualifications, welding and heat treating requirements, inspection and testing after repair, and documentation requirements. Employees were exposed to catastrophic release of ammonia which results in asphyxiation, explosion and flash fire leading to death and injury to persons in and near the facility. 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1) requires certification and documentation that the abatement of the above violation is completed.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.119 J03
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(3): The employer did not train each employee involve in maintaining the on-going mechanical integrity of process equipment in an overview of that process and its hazards and in the procedures applicable to the employee's job tasks to asssure that the employee can perform the job tasks in a safe manner: At the establishment, training for process maintenance activities was not implemented. The employer did not provide training for the Ammonia Department employees such as, but not limited to, all operators, technicians, maintenance employees, and hazardous chemical release responders related to the maintaining of the on-going mechanical integrity of ammonia refrigeration system; the ammonia system equipment; the inspection, testing and preventive maintenance procedures applicable to the employee's job tasks to assure that the employees can perform the job tasks in a safe manner. Employees were exposed to catastrophic release of ammonia which results in asphyxiation, explosion and flash fire leading to death and injury to persons in and near the facility. 29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1) requires certification and documentation that the abatement of the above violation is completed.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $4900.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
More inspections at Sugar Creek Packing Company, INC.
View Sugar Creek Packing Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311612)
More inspections in KS
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 316036458.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.