Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,192,068Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-04 Last loaded 2026-08-07

OSHA Inspection: SUTHERLAND WELL SERVICE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SUTHERLAND WELL SERVICE in MARKHAM-TUSSEY, STEPHENS COUNTY, RATLIFF CITY, OK 73081 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 316237759.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sutherland Well Service for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sutherland Well Service is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
MARKHAM-TUSSEY, STEPHENS COUNTY
City
RATLIFF CITY
State
OK
ZIP
73081
Mailing
9716 HWY 76, HEALDTON, OK 73438
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213112
SIC code (legacy)
1389
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2012
Abate by
Apr 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm in that
employees were exposed
to the hazard of a blocked emergency egress.
For the employee working in the derrick hanging sucker rod on or about
February 9, 2012, and
times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure the emergency escape
device was rigged up and
available for the employee to use in the event of an emergency. Employees
were exposed to fall,
struck by, and fire hazards.
Among other useful and feasible methods to abate the hazard the employer
can correct this
hazardous situation by ensuring an emergency escape device is installed to
the manufacturer's
recommendation before working in the derrick.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100.00
  • · Z (S) $3500.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 30, 2012
Abate by
Apr 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm in that
employees were exposed
to the hazard of collapse of the mast:
For the employees working within the radius of the derrick on or about
February 9, 2012, and
times prior thereto, the employer did not ensure the guy wires were
properly rigged to the
anchors. Employees were exposed to fall and struck by hazards.
Among other useful and feasible abatement methods, the employer can train
employees in the
proper method of rigging guy wires and the proper connecting of wire rope
to chain.ting
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100.00
  • · Z (S) $3500.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 316237759.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.