HONOLULU, HI —
OSHA Inspection: P & E FOODS INC
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of P & E FOODS INC in 3077 KOAPAKA ST #202, HONOLULU, HI 96819 (NAICS 493120). OSHA activity number 316269232.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- P & E FOODS INC
- Site address
- 3077 KOAPAKA ST #202
- City
- HONOLULU
- State
- HI
- ZIP
- 96819
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 493120
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4222
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
600002 A03
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,375 · Current $960 Reduced
General-duty citation text
HAR 12-60-2(a)(3) was violated because: The employer failed to address unanchored column legs and damaged support braces due to incidental contact with forklifts, thus exposing employees to struck by and crushed by hazards. ANSI MH16.1:2008, Specification for the Development, Testing, and Utilization of Industrial Steel Storage Racks, Section 1.4.7 states "All rack columns shall be anchored to the floor with anchor bolts capable of resisting the forces caused by the horizontal and vertical loads on the rack." 12-60-2(a)(3) states "Every employer shall provide safe work places and practices by elimination or reduction of existing or potential hazards. Elimination of existing or potential hazards by design, process substitution, or other appropriate methods is preferred because it eliminates the need for further employee protection. When elimination is not feasible, reduction of existing or potential hazards to acceptable levels, using methods such as engineering or administrative controls, isolation, or guarding, shall be promptly used. When these methods are inadequate to reach acceptable levels, personal protective equipment shall be provided and used." Location: Establishment
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $960.00
- — I (S) $960.00
- — Z (S) $1375.00
600002 A03
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2013
General-duty citation text
HAR 12-60-2(a)(3) was violated because: The employer failed to regularly inspect rack systems for damage and replace or repair damaged racks. Employees were working in a warehouse where the shelving units were damaged and bent from incidental contact with forklifts, thus being exposed to struck by and crushed by hazards. ANSI MH16.1:2008 Specification for the Design, Testing, and Utilization of Industrial Steel Storage Racks, Section 1.4.1(2) states "The owner shall maintain the structural integrity of the installed rack system by assuring proper operation, housekeeping, and maintenance procedures including, but not limited to the following: (1) Prohibit any overloading of any pallet positions and of the overall rack system. (2) Regularly inspect for damage. If damage is found, immediately unload the affected area and replace or repair any damaged columns, beams or other structural components." 12-60-2(a)(3) states "Every employer shall provide safe work places and practices by elimination or reduction of existing or potential hazards. Elimination of existing or potential hazards by design, process substitution, or other appropriate methods is preferred because it eliminates the need for further employee protection. When elimination is not feasible, reduction of existing or potential hazards to acceptable levels, using methods such as engineering or administrative controls, isolation, or guarding, shall be promptly used. When these methods are inadequate to reach acceptable levels, personal protective equipment shall be provided and used." Location: Establishment
Recent events (3)
- — P (S)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.38 C03
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,375 · Current $960 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $960.00
- — Z (S) $1375.00
1910.38 F03
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 18, 2013
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.178 L04 IIA
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2013
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $3,850 · Current $2,620 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2620.00
- — Z (S) $3850.00
1910.1200 H02
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $1,375 · Current $960 Reduced
0170
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $960.00
- — I (S) $960.00
- — Z (S) $1375.00
1910.1200 H03 III
- Issued
- Jun 10, 2013
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2013
0170
Recent events (3)
- — P (S)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
More inspections at P & E Foods INC
View P & E Foods INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 493120)
More inspections in HI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 316269232.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.