Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: COASTAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC.

Accident-driven inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven health inspection of COASTAL CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC. in 226 10TH STREET, LAKE PARK, FL 33403 (NAICS 561790). OSHA activity number 316328665.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Coastal Chemical Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Coastal Chemical Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
226 10TH STREET
City
LAKE PARK
State
FL
ZIP
33403
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
561790
SIC code (legacy)
7389
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 E03 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2012
Abate by
Nov 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0640

29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(iii):  The process hazard analysis did not address
the engineering and
administrative controls applicable to the hazards and their
interrelationship, such as respirators
when connecting and disconnecting chlorine containers:
As determined on or about 5/15/2012, the process hazard analysis did not
identify administrative
controls such as respirators when connecting and disconnecting filling
lines to the chlorine
cylinders.
PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS
REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1400.00
  • — Z (S) $2800.00

1910.119 F01 IIIB

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2012
Abate by
Nov 26, 2012

Hazardous substances 0640

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(iii)(B):  The employer did not develop and implement
written operating
procedures that addressed precautions necessary to prevent exposure,
including engineering
controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment:
As determined on or about 5/15/2012, the employer had not developed and
implemented written
operating procedures that addressed the use of a full face respirator when
connecting
and
disconnecting filling lines to the chlorine cylinders to prevent exposure.
PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS
REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.119 J04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2012
Abate by
Nov 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0640

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i):  Inspections and tests were not performed on
process equipment to
maintain its mechanical integrity:
As determined on or about 5/15/2012, the employer did not perform
inspections and tests on the
flexible transfer hoses that were used during the filling of 20-pound
chlorine cylinders.
PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS
REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2100.00
  • — Z (S) $2800.00

1910.134 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2012
Abate by
Nov 26, 2012
Penalty
Initial $6,300 · Current $5,425 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(a)(1): When effective engineering controls were not
feasible or while they
were being instituted, appropriate respirators were not used pursuant to
the requirements of this
section:
As determined on or about 5/15/2012, a full face respirator was not used
by
an employee when
connecting and disconnecting lines during the filing 20-pound chlorine
cylinders.
PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS
REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5425.00
  • — Z (S) $6300.00

1910.132 D01 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2012
Abate by
Dec 7, 2012
29 CFR 1910.132 (d)(1)(i): When the employer had assessed the workplace
hazard(s) and
determined that the hazard(s) were present, the employer did not select
and/or use the types of
personal protective equipment (PPE) that would protect the affected
employee from hazard(s):
As observed at the facility on or about 8/3/2012, the employer did not
ensure that employees
working with chlorine gas wear the appropriate neoprene gloves that were
identified in the
hazard assessment.
PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS
VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.134 C01 IX

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2012
Abate by
Dec 28, 2012
29 CFR 1910.134 (c)(1)(ix): The written respiratory protection program did
not include the
procedures for regularly evaluating the effectiveness of the program.
As determined on or about 5/15/2012, the respirator program did not
include procedures for
evaluating the effectiveness of the program.
PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS
VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2012
Abate by
Dec 28, 2012
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation
to determine the
employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested
or required to use the
respirator in the workplace.
As determined on or about 5/15/2012, the employer did not provide a
medical evaluation for
employees who were provided with full-face air purifying and half-face
particulate respirators.
PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS
VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 13, 2012
Abate by
Dec 28, 2012
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employees using a
tight-fitting
facepiece respirator pass an appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or
quantitative fit test
(QFNT):
As determined on or about 5/15/2012, the employer did not fit test
employees who were
provided with 3M half-face and full-face air purifying respirators.
PLEASE NOTE: CERTIFICATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS
VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

View Coastal Chemical Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 316328665.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.