GILBERTSVILLE, NY —
OSHA Inspection: BUTTERNUTS TN HIGHWAY DEPT
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BUTTERNUTS TN HIGHWAY DEPT in 3 VALE ST, GILBERTSVILLE, NY 13776 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 316759836.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BUTTERNUTS TN HIGHWAY DEPT
- Site address
- 3 VALE ST
- City
- GILBERTSVILLE
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13776
- Mailing
- PO BOX 275, GILBERTSVILLE, NY 13776
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237310
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1611
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- B
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
3A0001
- Issued
- Jan 2, 2015
- Abate by
- Sep 3, 2017
General-duty citation text
NYSLL Article 2, Section 27-a.3.a(1): The employer did not furnish to each of its employees, employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that are causing or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to its employees and which will provide reasonable and adequate protection to the lives, safety or health of its employees. In applying this paragraph, fundamental distinctions between private and public employment have been recognized. Location: Butternuts Tn Highway Garage: The interior concrete block wall separating the office space from the maintenance bays exhibited signs of structural failure due to settling of the ground that the structure is built upon, presenting a struck by, caught under or crushing hazard. Employees are required to walk through two doors located on this structurally compromised wall and work adjacent to the wall while working in the maintenance bay daily. Support for Serious Hazard Violation a)Type of accident or health hazard the general duty clause was designed to prevent: Struck by, caught under or crushing due to wall collapse. b)Type of injury which could occur: Broken bones, lacerations, contusions, internal injuries. c)Death or serious physical harm from accident: Death or serious physical harm is possible. d)Employer Knowledge: The employer (Highway Superintendent and Town Supervisor) admitted they were aware of the structural problems. Interim measures have been attempted. In plain view. General Duty Support A)Employer did not provide a place of employment free of recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause serious physical harm to employees. a.Employees are required to walk through two doors located on this structurally compromised wall and work adjacent to the wall while working in the maintenance bay daily. B)The hazard was recognized/foreseeable. a.The hazard was in plain view. The wall shows both signs of horizontal and vertical cracking. Employee interviews indicated this structure has been similarly defective for years. Steel plates with turnbuckles were installed in the hallway a number of years ago in an attempt to counteract the ground settling. No bracing or reinforcement has been installed along the length of the wall. The upcoming winter snow load could create an added danger. C)The hazard was causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm. a.Collapse of this wall would likely cause serious physical harm including broken bones, contusions, or internal injuries. Death is possible. D)There is a feasible and adequate abatement method to correct the hazard. Among other methods, some reasonable and adequate methods to correct this hazard include but are not limited to: ensuring that no employees enter the building at any time for any reason other than to make repairs, until such time as it has been determined that the building is safe for entry. (Professional Engineer determination); perform repairs on the existing structure in accordance with the 2010 Existing Building Code of New York State; or replace the structure. Reasonable and adequate abatement methods were discussed with the Town Supervisor.
Recent events (2)
- — Z (S)
- — P (S)
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Jul 2, 2014
1910.303 B07 IV
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2014
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 5, 2014
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 5, 2014
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 26, 2014
1910.106 G03 III
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Mar 19, 2014
1926.56 B
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 26, 2014
1910.244 A01 II
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 5, 2014
1910.147 C04 IIB
- Issued
- Jan 10, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 26, 2014
More inspections at Butternuts TN Highway Dept
View Butternuts TN Highway Dept's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237310)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 316759836.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.