Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BUTTERNUTS TN HIGHWAY DEPT

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BUTTERNUTS TN HIGHWAY DEPT in 3 VALE ST, GILBERTSVILLE, NY 13776 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 316759836.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Butternuts TN Highway Dept — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Butternuts TN Highway Dept is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3 VALE ST
City
GILBERTSVILLE
State
NY
ZIP
13776
Mailing
PO BOX 275, GILBERTSVILLE, NY 13776
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Y
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237310
SIC code (legacy)
1611
Employees
6
Ownership type
B

10 citations on file for this inspection.

3A0001

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 2, 2015
Abate by
Sep 3, 2017
NYSLL Article 2, Section 27-a.3.a(1):  The employer did not furnish to
each of its employees,
employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized
hazards that are causing
or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to its employees
and which will provide
reasonable and adequate protection to the lives, safety or health of its
employees.  In applying
this paragraph, fundamental distinctions between private and public
employment have been
recognized.
Location: Butternuts Tn Highway Garage: The interior concrete block wall
separating the office
space from the maintenance bays exhibited signs of structural failure due
to settling of the
ground that the structure is built upon, presenting a struck by, caught
under or crushing hazard.
Employees are required to walk through two doors located on this
structurally compromised wall
and work adjacent to the wall while working in the maintenance bay daily.
Support for Serious Hazard Violation
a)Type of accident or health hazard the general duty clause was designed
to prevent:
Struck by, caught under or crushing due to wall collapse.
b)Type of injury which could occur:
Broken bones, lacerations, contusions, internal injuries.
c)Death or serious physical harm from accident:
Death or serious physical harm is possible.
d)Employer Knowledge:
The employer (Highway Superintendent and Town Supervisor) admitted they
were aware
of the structural problems.  Interim measures have been attempted. In
plain view.
General Duty Support
A)Employer did not provide a place of employment free of recognized
hazards that were
causing or likely to cause serious physical harm to employees.
a.Employees are required to walk through two doors located on this
structurally
compromised wall and work adjacent to the wall while working in the
maintenance bay daily.
B)The hazard was recognized/foreseeable.
a.The hazard was in plain view.  The wall shows both signs of horizontal
and vertical
cracking.  Employee interviews indicated this structure has been similarly
defective for years.
Steel plates with turnbuckles were installed in the hallway a number of
years ago in an attempt
to counteract the ground settling. No bracing or reinforcement has been
installed
along the length
of the wall.  The upcoming winter snow load could create an added danger.
C)The hazard was causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm.
a.Collapse of this wall would likely cause serious physical harm including
broken bones,
contusions, or internal injuries.  Death is possible.
D)There is a feasible and adequate abatement method to correct the hazard.
Among other methods, some reasonable and adequate methods to correct this
hazard include but
are not limited to: ensuring that no employees enter the building at any
time for any reason other
than to make repairs, until such time as it has been determined that the
building is safe for entry.
(Professional Engineer determination); perform repairs on the existing
structure in accordance
with the 2010 Existing Building Code of New York State; or replace the
structure. Reasonable
and adequate abatement methods were discussed with the Town Supervisor.
Recent events (2)
  • — Z (S)
  • — P (S)

1910.22 A02

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Jul 2, 2014

1910.303 B07 IV

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Mar 19, 2014

1910.303 B01

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 5, 2014

1910.305 B02 I

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 5, 2014

1910.303 B02

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 26, 2014

1910.106 G03 III

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Mar 19, 2014

1926.56 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 26, 2014

1910.244 A01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 5, 2014

1910.147 C04 IIB

Other-than-serious 1 instance
Issued
Jan 10, 2014
Abate by
Feb 26, 2014

View Butternuts TN Highway Dept's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 316759836.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.