COOPERSTOWN, NY —
OSHA Inspection: OTSEGO CO HIGHWAY DEPT
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of OTSEGO CO HIGHWAY DEPT in 20 LINDEN AVE, COOPERSTOWN, NY 13326 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 316760859.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OTSEGO CO HIGHWAY DEPT
- Site address
- 20 LINDEN AVE
- City
- COOPERSTOWN
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13326
- Mailing
- 197 MAIN ST, COOPERSTOWN, NY 13326
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237310
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1611
- Employees
- 40
- Ownership type
- B
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
3A0001
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Feb 9, 2015
General-duty citation text
NYSLL Article 2, Section 27-a.3.a(1): The employer did not furnish to each of its employees, employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that are causing or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to its employees and which will provide reasonable and adequate protection to the lives, safety or health of its employees. In applying this paragraph, fundamental distinctions between private and public employment have been recognized. Location: Otsego County Highway Department, Main Building, Parking Garage: One of the lintels for an overhead garage door was damaged by a backhoe moving below it. A portion of the damaged header section and several lose 4-inch masonry bricks in the first row above the header were removed. The damage caused by the backhoe and the removal of the header section and masonry bricks have compromised the structural integrity in this area presenting a struck by, caught under or crushing hazard. Employees are required to walk or drive through the structurally compromised garage bay. Support for Serious Hazard Violation a)Type of accident or health hazard the general duty clause was designed to prevent: Struck by, caught under or crushing due to structure collapse. b)Type of injury which could occure: Broken bones, lacerations, contusions, internal injuries. c)Death or serious physical harm from accident: Death or serious physical harm is possible. d) Employer Knowledge: The employer (Highway Superintendent) admitted awareness of the structural problems. Interim measures have been attempled. The hazard is in plain view at the worksite. General Duty Support A)Employer did not provide a place of employment free of recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause serious physical harm to employees. a) Employees are required to walk or drive through the structurally compromised garage bay. The hazard was in plain view. When the lintel of the overhead door was damaged by a backhoe moving below it, a portion of the damaged header section and several loose 4-inch masonry bricks in the first row above the header were removed. Employee interviews indicate that the area was blocked off at one time to warn against falling debris. The damaged headersection and masonry bricks in the first row above the damaged header that were removed from the structure when it was damaged were not repaired or replaced. The damaged section is outdoors and exposed to the elements which could create additional damage and added danger. B) The hazard was recognized/foreseeable. a)This type of hazard is recognized by industry recognition and by common sense recognition. The structural damage and deficiencies where evaluated and confirmed by a professional engineer on or about September 5, 2014. C) The hazard was causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm. a)Debris falling from this overhead walkway/drive through area would be likely to cause serious physical harm including broken bones, contusions, or internal injuries. Death is possible. D) There is a feasible and adequate abatement method to correct the hazard. Among other methods, some reasonable and adequate methods to correct this hazard include but are not limited to: ensuring that no employees enter or exit the garage bay at any time for any reason other than to make repairs, until such time as it has been determined that the area is safe for entry/egress. (Professional Engineer determination: perform repairs on the existing structure in accordance with the 2010 Existing Building Code of New York State; or replace the structure. Reasonable and adequate abatement methods were discussed with the Highway Superintendent.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 17, 2014
1910.22 A02
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 17, 2014
1910.36 D01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2014
1910.36 E01
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 17, 2014
1910.36 E02
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Nov 17, 2014
1910.37 A02
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2014
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2014
1910.37 B02
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Oct 27, 2014
1910.38 B
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2014
- Abate by
- Dec 29, 2014
More inspections at Otsego CO Highway Dept
View Otsego CO Highway Dept's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237310)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 316760859.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.