TROY, NY —
OSHA Inspection: TROY CITY DPW
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TROY CITY DPW in 3118 7TH AVENUE, TROY, NY 12180 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 317042224.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TROY CITY DPW
- Site address
- 3118 7TH AVENUE
- City
- TROY
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 12180
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237310
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1611
- Employees
- 90
- Ownership type
- B
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
3A0001
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2015
General-duty citation text
NYSLL Article 2, Section 27-a.3.a(1): The employer did not furnish to each of its employees, employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that are causing or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to its employees and which will provide reasonable and adequate protection to the lives, safety or health of its employees. In applying this paragraph, fundamental distinctions between private and public employment have been recognized. (a) Troy City DPW - The employer had not provided a safety and health program to ensure employees are operating the equipment properly, as required by ANSI Z245.1-1999, and the manufacturer's operating manuals. Employees assigned to refuse collection were exposed to the hazards of falling off and being struck by refuse collection vehicles during assigned work duties. 1) The employer failed to keep the workplace free from a hazard which employees were exposed: The Troy City DPW did not keep the workplace free from the hazards created by failing to provide the employees with safe work procedures during the performance of their refuse collection duties. Employees are exposed to falls and struck by hazards from riding on the steps of the truck as it travels in reverse and from riding on the steps of the truck as it travels at speeds greater than 10mph. These hazards can result in broken bones, crush injuries and death. This standard is intended to prevent these types of injuries. (2) The hazard was recognized: The employer allowed employees to ride on the steps of a refuse collection truck as it traveled in reverse. The employer allowed 1 employee to ride on the steps of a refuse collection truck as it traveled at a speed greater than 10mph. Hazards created by the failure to provide and comply with safe work procedures are recognized by the manufacturer as they have warning labels prominently displayed on the refuse collection trucks. These hazards are further recognized by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and the National Solid Waste Management Association (NSWMA) who has developed comprehensive safety practices for workers engaged in solid waste collection that are detailed in the NSWMA Manual of Recommended Safety Practices. (3) The hazard was causing or was likely to cause death or serious physical harm: Riding on the steps of a refuse collection truck that is traveling in reverse or that is traveling at a speed greater than 10mph can lead to a slip or fall from the step. This slip or fall could result in serious physical injury such as abrasions, broken bones and crush injuries or even death. (4) A reasonable and adequate method to correct the hazard exists: A feasible abatement method, among others, would be for the employer to provide procedures for ensuring that employees are practicing safe work practices and for employer monitoring of equipment use. The provision of safe work procedures such as those documented in the NSWMA Manual of Recommended Safety Practices and in the July 14, 2006 PESH Directive on refuse collection vehicles will prevent worker injuries and deaths from moving refuse collection vehicles. These procedures should include the following: - The speed at which riding on the steps is permitted (less than 10mph) - Distances that riding on the steps is permitted (less than 0.2 miles, never in reverse). - No one rides on the loading sills or in hoppers. - Backing up procedures (maintaining visual eye contact between driver and worker, checking both mirrors repeatedly, use of a spotter, use of hand signals, remaining clear of the vehicle when in reverse). - Proper personal protective equipment (high visibility clothing, slip resistant footwear). The employer should also follow recommendations made in ANSI Standard Z 245.1 and the manufacturer owner's manuals for safe work procedures.
3A0001
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2015
- Abate by
- Mar 5, 2015
General-duty citation text
NYSLL Article 2, Section 27-a.3.a(1): The employer did not furnish to each of its employees, employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that are causing or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to its employees and which will provide reasonable and adequate protection to the lives, safety or health of its employees. In applying this paragraph, fundamental distinctions between private and public employment have been recognized. (a) Troy City DPW - The employer had not provided training and education for employees who operate and work around refuse collection equipment, as required by ANSI Z245.1-1999, and the manufacturer's operating manuals. The lack of training and hazard awareness related to refuse collection equipment can result in falls and crushing injuries. (1)The employer failed to keep the workplace free from a hazard which employees were exposed: The Troy City DPW did not keep the workplace free from the hazards created by failing to provide the employees with training on safe work procedures. The employer had not provide training and education for employees who operate and work around refuse collection equipment as required by ANSI Z 245.1-1999 and the manufacturers operating manuals. Employees are exposed to falls and struck by hazards from riding on the steps of the truck as it travels in reverse and from riding on the steps of the truck as it travels at speeds greater than 10mph. These hazards can result in broken bones, crush injuries and death. The lack of training and hazard awareness related to refuse collection equipment can result in falls and crushing injuries. Without training on specific procedures, the employees have been exposed to hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm. (2)The hazard was recognized: Hazards created by the failure to provide and train employees on safe work procedures are recognized by the manufacturer as they provide operating manuals that have specific training, use and maintenance requirements. These hazards are further recognized by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) as they recommend that employers train workers on safe work procedures for riding on and working near moving refuse collection vehicles. The National Solid Waste Management Association (NSWMA) has developed comprehensive safety practices for workers engaged in solid waste collection that are detailed in the NSWMA Manual of Recommended Safety Practices. (3) The hazard was causing or was likely to cause death or serious physical harm: Riding on the steps of a refuse collection truck that is traveling in reverse or that is traveling at a speed greater than 10mph canlead to a slip or fall from the step. This slip or fall could result in serious physical injury such as abrasions, broken bones and crush injuries or even death. These are the types of injuries that could be prevented with proper training. (4)A reasonable and adequate method to correct the hazard exists: A feasible abatement method, among others, would be for the employer to provide a training and education program for employees prior to assignment to working with this type of equipment and to routinely re-enforce the training by tailgate training sessions so that employees are familiar with safety hazards and safe work practices related to refuse collection equipment. The training on safe work procedures such as those documented in the NSWMA Manual of Recommended Safety Practices and in the July 14, 2006 PESH Directive on refuse collection vehicles will prevent worker injuries and deaths from moving refuse collection vehicles. This training should include the following: - The speed at which riding on the steps is permitted (less than 10mph) - Distances that riding on the steps is permitted (less than 0.2 miles, never in reverse). - No one rides on the loading sills or in hoppers. - Backing up procedures (maintaining visual eye contact between driver and worker, checking both mirrors repeatedly, use of a spotter, use of hand signals, remaining clear of the vehicle when in reverse). - Proper personal protective equipment (high visibility clothing, slip resistant footwear). The employer should also follow recommendations made in ANSI Standard Z 245.1 and the manufacturer owner's manuals for safe work procedures and training.
More inspections at Troy City DPW
View Troy City DPW's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237310)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 317042224.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.