BOW, NH —
OSHA Inspection: URS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of URS in 97 RIVER ROAD, BOW, NH 03304 (NAICS 237130). OSHA activity number 330016700.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- URS
- Site address
- 97 RIVER ROAD
- City
- BOW
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03304
- Mailing
- 97 RIVER ROAD, BOW, NH 03304
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237130
- Employees
- 50000
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- Jul 13, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 27, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,750 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions andthe regulations applicable to his work environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury. a. Site - The employees were not adequately trained in the methods and procedures to be used when applying both danger and lockout tags.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3750
1926.200 B01
- Issued
- Jul 13, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 27, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.200(b)(1): Danger signs (see Figure G-1) were not used only when an immediate hazard exists a. Gypsum Building motors G1A and G1B - The employer did not use a danger sign to notify employees employees that a circuit was locked in the live/closed position. Instead the employer used a lockout/tagout device (tag) to lock the circuit in the live/closed position which could have caused an employee to understand that an energized circuit was de-energized. b. FDG Building Sterling Boiler temporary power panel upper level - The employer did not use a danger sign to notify employees that a circuit was locked in the live/closed position. Instead the employer used a lockout/tagout device (tag) to lock the circuit in the live/closed position which could have caused an employee to understand that an energized circuit was de-energized. c. Smoke Stack FAA light control panel - The employer did not use a danger sign to notify employees that a circuit was locked in the live/closed position. Instead the employer used a lockout/tagout device (tag) to lock the circuit in the live/closed position which could have caused an employee to understand that an energized circuit was de-energized.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.34 B
- Issued
- Jul 13, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,250 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.34(b): Exits were not marked by a readily visible sign: (a) FGD Building - Exit doorways were not labeled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2250
More inspections at URS
View URS's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237130)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330016700.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.