GREAT FALLS, MT —
OSHA Inspection: AVMAX MONTANA, INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of AVMAX MONTANA, INC. in 1930 AIRPORT COURT, GREAT FALLS, MT 59404 (NAICS 488190). OSHA activity number 330291931.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AVMAX MONTANA, INC.
- Site address
- 1930 AIRPORT COURT
- City
- GREAT FALLS
- State
- MT
- ZIP
- 59404
- Mailing
- 1930 AIRPORT COURT, GREAT FALLS, MT 59404
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 488190
- Employees
- 139
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2700
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,295 · Current $1,377 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1377
- — Z (S) $2295
1910.1026 H03 II
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 2, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(h)(3)(ii): The employer did not prohibit the removal of chromium (VI) from protective clothing and equipment by blowing, shaking, or any other means that dispersed chromium (VI) into the air or onto an employee's body:
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1026 D01
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2700
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.1026 E02
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
0694
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(e)(2): The employer did not ensure that a regulated area for chromium (VI) was demarcated from the rest of the workplace in a manner that adequately established and alerted employees of the boundaries of the regulated area:
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2700
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.1026 K01 I A
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(k)(1)(i)(A): The employer did not make medical surveillance available at no cost to the employee, and at a reasonable time and place for all employees who are or may be occupationally exposed to chromium (VI) at or above the action level for 30 or more days a year:
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2700
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.1026 L02 I A
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
0694
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(i)(A): The employer did not provide appropriate information and training for all employees exposed to chromium (VI), in that employees could not demonstrate knowledge of the contents of the Chromium (VI) standard, 29 CFR 1910.1026: (a) (LOCATION) (IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATIONS AND/OR DEPARTMENTS)
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2700
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Avmax Montana, INC.
View Avmax Montana, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 488190)
More inspections in MT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330291931.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.