BOZEMAN, MT —
OSHA Inspection: SICKLER RESIDENTIAL ROOFING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SICKLER RESIDENTIAL ROOFING in DURSTON ROAD, BOZEMAN, MT 59718 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 330292566.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SICKLER RESIDENTIAL ROOFING
- Site address
- DURSTON ROAD
- City
- BOZEMAN
- State
- MT
- ZIP
- 59718
- Mailing
- 143 LAAGER LOOP, BOZEMAN, MT 59715
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- May 5, 2011
- Abate by
- May 20, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,160 · Current $2,160
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fallhazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed inorder to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2160
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 5, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in MT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330292566.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.