Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SICKLER RESIDENTIAL ROOFING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SICKLER RESIDENTIAL ROOFING in DURSTON ROAD, BOZEMAN, MT 59718 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 330292566.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sickler Residential Roofing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sickler Residential Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
DURSTON ROAD
City
BOZEMAN
State
MT
ZIP
59718
Mailing
143 LAAGER LOOP, BOZEMAN, MT 59715
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2011
Abate by
May 20, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,160 · Current $2,160
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fallhazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed inorder to minimize these hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2160

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 5, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330292566.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.