WOLFEBORO, NH —
OSHA Inspection: JACOB STANLEY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JACOB STANLEY in 40 COLUMBUS AVENUE, WOLFEBORO, NH 03894 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 330294752.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JACOB STANLEY
- Site address
- 40 COLUMBUS AVENUE
- City
- WOLFEBORO
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03894
- Mailing
- 15 HIGH STREET, WOLFEBORO, NH 03894
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s) a. Site- Employees were exposed to fall, scaffold collapse, head, and eye hazards where a competent person did not conduct frequent and regular inspections of the jobsite.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration: a. Site- Employees were exposed to fall and scaffold collapse hazards where a competent person did not supervise the erection of ladder jack scaffolding on site.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.454 A
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 22, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards. a. Site- Employees working from ladder jack scaffolding were not provided with scaffold training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 22, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a. Site- Employees working from the roof and exposed to falls were not provided with fall protection training from the employer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: a. site- Employees working below ladder jack scaffolding were exposed to over head struck by hazards where head protection was not used or provided.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. a. Site- Employees operating pneumatic nail guns were exposed to eye hazards where eye protection was not used or provided.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.451 F01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(1): Scaffold and/or scaffold components were loaded in excess of their maximum intended loads or rated capacities, whichever was less: a. Site- Employees were exposed to scaffold collapse hazards where extension ladders and scaffold platforms as part of a ladder jack scaffold were loaded beyond their rated capacities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.452 K05
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(5): Scaffold platforms were bridged on to another. a. Site- Employees were exposed to scaffold collapse hazards where ladder jack scaffolding utilized metal scaffold platforms that were bridged over a common ladder.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 I
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system: a. Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were exposed to a fall of approximately 18 feet where fall protection was not used or provided.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: a. Site- An employee working from an 8 pitch roof was exposed to a fall of approximately 18 feet where fall protection was not used or provided.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access: a. Site- Employees accessing a ladder jack scaffold were exposed to a fall hazard where the access ladder did not extend three feet above the landing surface.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3000
1926.1053 B09
- Issued
- Jul 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(9): The area around the top and bottom of ladders was not kept clear: a. Site- Employees accessing a ladder jack scaffold were exposed to a fall hazard where they were climbing over a scaffold platform to access a ladder that was supporting the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330294752.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.