Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: REPUBLIC SERVICES OF BOISE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of REPUBLIC SERVICES OF BOISE in 11101 EXECUTIVE DR., BOISE, ID 83713 (NAICS 562111). OSHA activity number 330294810.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Republic Services of Boise for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Republic Services of Boise is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11101 EXECUTIVE DR.
City
BOISE
State
ID
ZIP
83713
Mailing
11101 EXECUTIVE DR., BOISE, ID 83713
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562111
Employees
142
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1904.7 B03

Other-than-serious 4 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(3): When an injury or illness involved one or more days away from work, the employer did not record the injury or illness on the OSHA 300 Log by placing a check mark in the space and enter the number of calendar days away from work in the number of days column:\\t\\r\\n\\r\\n  a) On or about 05/09/2011, case 710508982 on the 2008 OSHA Log did not accurately reflect 16 calendar days away from work.    b) On or about 05/09/2011, case 710524119 on the 2008 OSHA Log did not accurately reflect 9 calendar days away from work.    c) On or about 05/09/2011, case 7879 on the 2009 OSHA Log did not accurately reflect 7 calendar days away from work.    d) On or about 05/09/2011, case B096866 on the 2010 OSHA Log did not accurately reflect 42 calendar days away from work.      Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1904.7 B04

Other-than-serious 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1904.7(b)(4): When an injury or illness involved restricted work or job transfer, but did not involve death or days away from work, the employer did not record the injury or illness on the OSHA 300 Log by placing a check mark in the space and enter the number of days of restricted or transferred days in the restricted workdays column:\\r\\n\\r\\n  (a) On or about 05/09/2011, case 7804 on the 2009 OSHA Log did not accurately reflect 14 calendar days of restricted work.    (b) On or about 05/09/2011, case B436879 on the 2010 OSHA Log did not accurately reflect 38 calendar days of restricted work.      Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Sep 21, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR  1910.134(g)(1)((i)[A]: Respirators with tight-fitting face pieces were worn by employees with a condition that interfered with the face-to-face piece seal or valve function:\r\n\r\n(a)\tPaint shop: On 05/09/2011 and at times prior thereto, employee(s) with facial hair that comes between the sealing surface and the face was allowed to wear tight fitting face piece respirator when spray painting.\r\n\r\n\r\nNote: Abatement certification IS required for this item\r\n
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 L02 III

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Sep 21, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(l)(2)(iii): The employer did not regularly consult employees required to use respirators to assess their views on the programs effectiveness and to identify any problems including, but not limited to, proper respirator use under the workplace conditions encountered by the employee was not included in the assessment of program effectiveness:    (a) In the paint booth in the shop: On 05/09/2011 and at times prior thereto employee input regarding the effectiveness of the respiratory protection in the shop and paint booth was not requested.    Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.242 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Sep 21, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.242(b): Compressed air used for cleaning purposes was not reduced to less than 30 p.s.i.:    (b) In the cabs of the trucks: On 05/09/2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were exposed to air pressure in excess of 80 p.s.i. for cleaning the cabs of their trucks with out benefit of pressure reduction.      Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01 I

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Sep 21, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i): The written hazard communication program did not include a list of the hazardous chemicals known to be present, using an identity that was referenced on the appropriate material safety data sheet:    (a) In the Shop: On 05/09/2011 and at times prior thereto, employees had to look through the book to find the Material Safety Data Sheet for Republic (AW) Blue Premium paint, Aqua Enamel.    Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 III

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Sep 21, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iii): Employee training did not include the measures employees can take to protect themselves from chemical hazards, including specific procedures the employer had implemented to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals:    (a) In the Shop: On 05/09/2011 and at times prior thereto, employees were not trained in the measures to take to protect themselves from the hazards of the chemicals they were using including personal protective equipment to be used.      Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 330294810.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.