Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: NOMAD GLOBAL COMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of NOMAD GLOBAL COMMUNICATION SOLUTIONS in 5414 HWY 2 WEST, COLUMBIA FALLS, MT 59912 (NAICS 334290). OSHA activity number 330631565.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Nomad Global Communication Solutions for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Nomad Global Communication Solutions is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5414 HWY 2 WEST
City
COLUMBIA FALLS
State
MT
ZIP
59912
Mailing
PO BOX 865, KALISPELL, MT 59901
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
334290
Employees
71
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Abate by
Oct 3, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Every open-sided floor or platform 4 feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level was not guarded by a standard railing (or the equivalent as specified in paragraph (e)(3) of this section) on all open sides except where there is entrance to a ramp, stairway, or fixed ladder.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $4200

1910.26 C03 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Abate by
Oct 3, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.26(c)(3)(vii): Ladders were used as a brace, skid, guy or gin pole, gangway, or for other uses than that for which they were intended, unless specifically recommended for use by the manufacturer.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.107 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Abate by
Oct 3, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(2): Minimum separation. There was an open flame or spark producing equipment in the spraying area and within 20 feet thereof, and was not separated by a partition.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2450
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Abate by
Oct 3, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):     In any workplace where respirators are necessary to protect the health of the employee or whenever respirators are required by the employer, the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program with worksite-specific procedures. The program was not updated as necessary to reflect those changes in workplace conditions that affect respirator use. The employer did not include in the program the following provisions (i) through (ix) of this section, as applicable.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Abate by
Oct 3, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii):     In addition, the employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written respiratory protection program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily is medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator is cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user. Exception: Employers are not required to include in a written respiratory protection program those employees whose only use of respirators involves the voluntary use of filtering facepieces (dust masks).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1026 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Abate by
Oct 3, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $1,750 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): General. Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this section did not determine the 8-hour TWA exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI). This determination was not made in accordance with either paragraph (d)(2) or paragraph (d)(3) of this section.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1750
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Abate by
Oct 3, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employers did not develop, implement, and maintain at each workplace, a written hazard communication program which at least describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) of this section for labels and other forms of warning, material safety data sheets, and employee information and training will be met.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $1050
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Abate by
Oct 3, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employers did not provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability,carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and material safety datasheets.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.23 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 30, 2011
Abate by
Oct 3, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.23(d)(1)(iii):     Every flight of stairs having four or more risers were not equipped with standard stair railings or standard handrails as specified in paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (v) of this section, the width of the stair to be measured clear of all obstructions except handrails. On stairways less than 44 inches wide having both sides open, one stair railing on each side.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 330631565.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.