Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: L.D.D. CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of L.D.D. CONSTRUCTION, INC. in WADSWORTH & DARTMOUTH, LAKEWOOD, CO 80201 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 330632910.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch L.D.D. Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for L.D.D. Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
WADSWORTH & DARTMOUTH
City
LAKEWOOD
State
CO
ZIP
80201
Mailing
P.O. BOX 270, DUPONT, CO 80024
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
237310
Employees
26
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2011
Abate by
Aug 2, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,410 · Current $0 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards which were likely to cause death or serious physical harm from injury in that, employees were exposed to the hazards of asphyxiated while entering and working inside of a manhole:    a) On or about June 7, 2011 and at times prior, employees were exposed to iserious hazards while working in a manhole. The manhole was entered under the following conditions:    1) without purging, inerting, flushing or ventilating the space;    2) without verifying that the condition in the space were acceptable for entry throughout the duration of entery;    3) without retrieval equipment in event of an emergency; and    4) without utilizing the permit system.     Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazardous condition includes, but is not limited to, the full implementation of the elements required by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Z117.1 (Safety Requirments for Confined Space).     Abatement Note:  Abatement certification and documentation is required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").       .
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $4410
  • — Z (S) $4410

1926.21 B06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2011
Abate by
Aug 4, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $2,500
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(6)(i): Employees required to enter into confined or enclosed spaces were not instructed as to the nature of the hazards involved, the necessary precautions to be taken, and in the use of protective and emergency equipment required:    a) On or about June 7, 2011 and times prior employees who worked in confined spaces were not instructed as to the nature of hazards involved, the necessary precautions to be taken, or the use of protective and emergency equipment.    Abatement Note:  Abatement certification and documentation is required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $2500
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.100 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2011
Abate by
Aug 2, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,890 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets.    a) On or about June 7, 2011 an employee was working in a workzone without using head protection.    Abatement Note:  Abatement certification and documentation is required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $1890
  • — Z (S) $1890

1926.200 G02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2011
Abate by
Aug 2, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,890 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.200(g)(2): All traffic control signs or devices used for protection of construction workers did not conform to Part VI of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD):    a) On or about June 7, 2011 employees pumping water from a manhole and moving dirt were exposed to struck by hazards in that, a proper work zone in accordance with the MUTCD was not set up (missing signs).    Abatement Note:  Abatement certification and documentation is required for this item (see enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $1200
  • — C (S) $1890
  • — Z (S) $1890

View L.D.D. Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330632910.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.