LEWIS CENTER, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: SOLOMAN RUIZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SOLOMAN RUIZ in 2636 ABBEY KNOLL DRIVE, LEWIS CENTER, OH 43035 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 330769340.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SOLOMAN RUIZ
- Site address
- 2636 ABBEY KNOLL DRIVE
- City
- LEWIS CENTER
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43035
- Mailing
- 4477 WESTERPOOL CIRCLE, COLUMBUS, OH 43228
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jul 28, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 4, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,040 · Current $2,040
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees used fall protection while working at heights greater than six feet, on a roof working/walking surface, thereby exposing employees to an approximate 13 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2040
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330769340.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.