HUDSON, OH ·
OSHA Inspection: NES CONTRACTING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NES CONTRACTING in RT 8 NORTH UNDER TURNPIKE, HUDSON, OH 44236 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 330770934.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NES CONTRACTING
- Site address
- RT 8 NORTH UNDER TURNPIKE
- City
- HUDSON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44236
- Mailing
- 9009 BROADVIEW RD., CUYAHOGA FALLS, OH 44301
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- Employees
- 16
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person. On or about June 01, 2011, during construction activities, the employer did not provide programs that included frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, and training for the hazards with the work being preformed at the worksite.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.453 B02 V
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift: On or about June 01, 2011, during construction activities, the employer allowed an employee to work in a bucket on a bucket truck and did not ensure that the employee was attached with a belt and lanyard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2000
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.On or about June 01, 2011, during construction activities, the employer allowed an employee to work on a bridge wall that was approximately 13 feet high and did not ensure that the employee was protected from falls.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3000
- · Z (S) $3600
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Nov 8, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person. On or about June 01, 2011, during construction activities, the employer allowed two employees to use a cable the employer had installed to a platform for an anchor in a personal fall arrest system and did not ensure that was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee or a safety factor of at least two.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $3600
More inspections at NES Contracting
View NES Contracting's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 330770934.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.