MADISON, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: MANSTRONG CONSTRUCTION INC.
Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of MANSTRONG CONSTRUCTION INC. in 601 MERRYTURN ROAD, MADISON, WI 53714 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 330771270.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MANSTRONG CONSTRUCTION INC.
- Site address
- 601 MERRYTURN ROAD
- City
- MADISON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53714
- Mailing
- 601 MERRYTURN ROAD, MADISON, WI 53714
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Programmed Related (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operationspresent potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. Employees were using a pneumatic nail gun to install shingles with no eye protection.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $900
- · C (S) $1800
- · Z (S) $1800
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): No employer shall permit an employee to work in such proximity to any part of an electric powercircuit that the employee could contact the electric power circuit in the course of work, unless the employee is protected against electric shock bydeenergizing the circuit and grounding it or by guarding it effectively by insulation or other means. Employees were performing roofing activities within close proximity to electrical power services.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1500
- · C (S) $3000
- · Z (S) $3000
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. Employees were engaged in residential roofing activities at a height greater than 6 feet with no fall protection.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1200
- · C (S) $2400
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fallhazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed inorder to minimize these hazards. Employees who were exposed to fall hazards were not trained in fall protection procedures to recognize and minimize those hazards.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1200
- · C (S) $2400
- · Z (S) $2400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 330771270.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.