Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PIONEER PLASTICS CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PIONEER PLASTICS CORPORATION in 3330 MASSILLON ROAD, AKRON, OH 44312 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 330922899.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Pioneer Plastics Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pioneer Plastics Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3330 MASSILLON ROAD
City
AKRON
State
OH
ZIP
44312
Mailing
3330 MASSILLON ROAD, AKRON, OH 44312
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
90
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.110 E04 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,380 · Current $1,428 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.110(e)(4)(iii): Permanent and removable fuel containers were not securely mounted to prevent jarring loose, slipping, or rotating:         As of 06/27/2011, the clasp used to secure the (LP) gas cylinder of the companys fork truck (the Nissan 50: model # KCPH08A25) was broken.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1428
  • — Z (S) $2380

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1):  If at any time a powered industrial truck is found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe, the truck shall be taken out of service until it has been restored to safe operating condition.           The employer failed to ensure that the company's Nissan 50: (LP) fork lift, model # KCPH08A25 (forklifts) was removed from service until restored to safe operations. Defects of the fork truck include, but are not limited to; the fork(s) of the fork truck were attached by a piece of wire instead of a lug nut or screw.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q) (7):  Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:            Inspections of the companys powered industrial trucks were not completed by operator(s) prior to the fork truck being placed into service.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed:            As of 06/27/2011,  the employer did not conduct a periodic inspections of company's energy control procedures at least annually to ensure the procedures and the requirement of the standards were being followed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(i): Operators were not trained in the safe operation of powered industrial trucks:                          As of 06/27/2011, the employer failed to establish a powered industrial vehicle (PIV) training program at the site which would have ensured that employees were trained to the level of competency needed to safely operate 	fork trucks at the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2011
Abate by
Jan 17, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $1,680 Reduced
1910.212(a) (1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.           As of 06/27/2011, the following equipment, located int the warehouse/production area was not properly guarded:    a.       Milacron: robotic arm which exposed operators to point of operation and caught by or struck by hazards.    b.      Dixon: press which was missing the ring guards thus, exposing operators to unintended operation of the            press and points of operation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $4900

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $1,260 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:        The company did not develop, implement, or maintain a written hazard communication program at the facility. Chemicals used at the facility include, but are not limited to, ABS Color Concentrate, (LP) gases, spray silicone and acid batteries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1260
  • — Z (S) $2100

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 23, 2011
Abate by
Feb 8, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training as specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1) and -2 on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard was introduced into their work area:               Employees who utilize chemicals such as, but not limited to, ABS Color Concentrate, spray silicone, propane or acid batteries at the facility, were not trained on the hazardous chemicals introduced into their work areas.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Pioneer Plastics Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330922899.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.