Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: ROB RAMONEDA

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ROB RAMONEDA in 215 E. MAIN ST, CARDINGTON, OH 43315 (NAICS 531210). OSHA activity number 330923954.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ROB Ramoneda for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ROB Ramoneda is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ROB RAMONEDA
Site address
215 E. MAIN ST
City
CARDINGTON
State
OH
ZIP
43315
Mailing
301 SOUTH MARION ST., CARDINGTON, OH 43315
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
531210
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 A02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2011
Abate by
Nov 10, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1910.134(a)(2):  A respirator was not provided to each employee when such equipment is necessary to protect the health of such employee. The employer did not provide the respirators which are applicable and suitable for the purpose intended. The employer did not establish and maintain of a respiratory protection program, which included the requirements outlined in paragraph (c) of this section. The program shall cover each employee required by this section to use a respirator.    a. Rob Ramoneda worksite located at 215 E. Main St., Cardington, Ohio:  On or about July 8, 2011, the employer did not ensure proper respiratory protection was provided to an employee removing asbestos containing siding and did not ensure a respiratory protection program was developed and implemented.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1926.1101 H01 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2011
Abate by
Nov 10, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(h)(1)(ii): Respirators were not used for Class II asbestos work when ACM was not removed in a substantially intact state.    a. Rob Ramoneda worksite located at 215 E. Main St., Cardington, Ohio:  On or about July 8, 2011, the employer did not ensure an employee removing asbestos containing siding was wearing a half mask tight fitting respirator.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1101 F02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2011
Abate by
Nov 10, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(2)(i):  Each employer who has a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not ensure that a "competent person" conducted an exposure assessment immediately before or at the initiation of the operation to ascertain expected exposures during that operation or workplace. The assessment was not completed in time to comply with requirements which are triggered by exposure data or the lack of a "negative exposure assessment," and to provide information necessary to assure that all control systems planned are appropriate for that operation and will work properly.    a. Rob Ramoneda worksite located at 215 E. Main St., Cardington, Ohio:  On or about July 8, 2011, the employer did not ensure an employee exposure assessment was conducted to determine employee exposures when removing siding that contained asbestos.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $1000
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1926.1101 F03 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2011
Abate by
Nov 10, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1101(f)(3)(i):   The employer did not conduct daily monitoring that was representative of the exposure of each employee who was assigned to work within a regulated area who was performing Class I or II work, unless the employer pursuant to (f)(2)(iii) of this section, has made a negative exposure assessment for the entire operation.    a. Rob Ramoneda worksite located at 215 E. Main St., Cardington, Ohio:  On or about July 8, 2011, the employer did not ensure periodic air monitoring was conducted to determine employee exposure to asbestos while removing siding that contained asbestos .    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1101 G01 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2011
Abate by
Nov 10, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(1)(iii): The employer did not ensure prompt clean-up and disposal of wastes and debris contaminated with asbestos in leak-tight containers except in roofing operations, where the procedures specified in paragraph (g)(8)(ii) of this section apply.    a. Rob Ramoneda worksite located at 215 E. Main St., Cardington, Ohio:  On or about July 8, 2011, the employer did not ensure an employee removing siding that contained asbestos promptly cleaned up any waste and debris.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1926.1101 G07 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2011
Abate by
Nov 10, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(7)(i): All Class II work was not supervised by a competent person as defined in paragraph (b) of this section.    a. Rob Ramoneda worksite located at 215 E. Main St., Cardington, Ohio:  On or about July 8, 2011, the employer did not ensure an employee removing siding that contained asbestos was supervised by a competent person.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1101 G08 III A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2011
Abate by
Nov 10, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(iii)(A): Cutting, abrading or breaking siding, shingles, or transite panels, was not prohibited unless the employer could demonstrate that methods less likely to result in asbestos fiber release cannot be used.    a. Rob Ramoneda worksite located at 215 E. Main St., Cardington, Ohio:  On or about July 8, 2011, the employer did not ensure an employee removing siding that contained asbestos did not break up the siding during removal.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1101 G08 III B

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2011
Abate by
Nov 10, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1101(g)(8)(iii)(B): Each panel or shingle was not sprayed with amended water prior to removal.    a. Rob Ramoneda worksite located at 215 E. Main St., Cardington, Ohio:  On or about July 8, 2011, the employer did not ensure an employee removing siding that contained asbestos sprayed each panel with water to minimize employee exposure to asbestos fibers.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1101 I01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2011
Abate by
Nov 10, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(i)(1):  The employer did not provide and require the use of protective clothing, such as coveralls or similar whole-body clothing, head coverings, gloves, and foot coverings for any employee exposed to airborne concentrations of asbestos that exceed the TWA and/or excursion limit prescribed in paragraph (c) of this section, or for which a required negative exposure assessment was not produced, or for any employee performing Class I operations which involve the removal of over 25 linear or 10 square feet of TSI or surfacing ACM and PACM.    a. Rob Ramoneda worksite located at 215 E. Main St., Cardington, Ohio:  On or about July 8, 2011, the employer did not ensure an employee removing siding that contained asbestos was provided with coveralls, head covering, and foot coverings.      In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1926.1101 J02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2011
Abate by
Nov 10, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(j)(2)(i): The employer did not establish an equipment room or area that was adjacent to the regulated area for the decontamination of employees and their equipment which were contaminated with asbestos which shall consist of an area covered by a impermeable drop cloth on the floor or horizontal working surface.    a. Rob Ramoneda worksite located at 215 E. Main St., Cardington, Ohio:  On or about July 8, 2011, the employer did not ensure a decontamination area was established for employees and their equipment which were contaminated with asbestos.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1926.1101 K07 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2011
Abate by
Nov 10, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(7)(i):  Warning signs that demarcate the regulated area were not provided and displayed at each location where a regulated area was required to be established by paragraph (e) of this section. Signs shall be posted at such a distance from such a location that an employee may read the signs and take necessary protective steps before entering the area marked by the signs.    a. Rob Ramoneda worksite located at 215 E. Main St., Cardington, Ohio:  On or about July 8, 2011, the employer did not ensure warning signs were posted where an employee was removing siding that contained asbestos.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

1926.1101 K08 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2011
Abate by
Nov 10, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9020

29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(8)(i):   Labels were not affixed to all products containing asbestos and to all containers containing such products, including waste containers. Where feasible, installed asbestos products shall contain a visible label.    a. Rob Ramoneda worksite located at 215 E. Main St., Cardington, Ohio:  On or about July 8, 2011, the employer did not ensure asbestos warning labels were affixed to plastic bags which contained asbestos siding.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1101 K09 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2011
Abate by
Nov 10, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1101(k)(9)(i): The employer did not, at no cost to the employee, institute a training program for all employees who are likely to be exposed in excess of a PEL and for all employees who perform Class I through IV asbestos operations, and did not ensure their participation in the program.    a. Rob Ramoneda worksite located at 215 E. Main St., Cardington, Ohio:  On or about July 8, 2011, the employer did not ensure an employee removing siding that contained asbestos was provided with training on the following topics:    1. Methods of recognizing asbestos;  2. The health effects associated with asbestos exposure;  3. The relationship between smoking and asbestos in producing lung cancer;  4. The nature of the operations that could result in exposure to asbestos and how to protect themselves from exposure;  5. Respirator training;  6. Appropriate work practices for removing asbstos siding;  7. The content of the asbestos standard;  8. Names, addresses, and phone numbers of public health officials;  9. The requirements for posting signs and affixing labels.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1101 L02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 3, 2011
Abate by
Nov 10, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1101(l)(2):  Asbestos waste, scrap, debris, bags, containers, equipment, and contaminated clothing consigned for disposal was not collected and disposed of in sealed, labeled, impermeable bags or other closed, labeled, impermeable containers except in roofing operations where the procedures specified in paragraph (g)(8)(ii) of this section apply.    a. Rob Ramoneda worksite located at 215 E. Main St., Cardington, Ohio:  On or about July 8, 2011, the employer did not ensure an employee removing siding that contained asbestos disposed of the debris in a sealed, labeled, impermeable bags or containers.    In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification.  This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence, or written records.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $0
  • · C (S) $3000
  • · Z (S) $3000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330923954.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.