Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: BURT LOUDENLAGER

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of BURT LOUDENLAGER in 9913 E. 1 ST., AURORA, CO 80422 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 330924226.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Burt Loudenlager for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Burt Loudenlager is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BURT LOUDENLAGER
Site address
9913 E. 1 ST.
City
AURORA
State
CO
ZIP
80422
Mailing
537 GAP ROAD, BLACK HAWK, CO 80422
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236116
Employees
20
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2011
Abate by
Sep 13, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a):     Employees were not protected by protective helmets while working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns:    a) On or about July 18, 2011, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from head injuries while handing materials without head protection to the employees on a pump-jack scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2011
Abate by
Sep 13, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    a) On or about July 18, 2011, employer did not ensure that employees were protected from eye injury while using the circular saw and the pneumatic gun without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2011
Abate by
Sep 13, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms:    a) On or about July 18, 2011, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from falls in excess of 14 feet while working off three pump-jack scaffolds with guardrails missing in the middle of the scaffolds and at the end of the scaffolds.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $4200

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 8, 2011
Abate by
Sep 13, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and/or a lanyard was not attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:     On or about July 18, 2011, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from falls in excess of 14 feet while working off two aerial lifts where the employees were not restrained in the basket.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $4200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 330924226.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.