Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: ACME MACHELL COMPANY, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ACME MACHELL COMPANY, INC. in 2000 AIRPORT ROAD, WAUKESHA, WI 53188 (NAICS 326291). OSHA activity number 330924655.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Acme Machell Company, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Acme Machell Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2000 AIRPORT ROAD
City
WAUKESHA
State
WI
ZIP
53188
Mailing
2000 AIRPORT ROAD, WAUKESHA, WI 53188
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326291
Employees
150
Ownership type
Private (A)

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2011
Abate by
Dec 28, 2011
Penalty
Initial $6,930 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    (a)  The employer failed to evaluate authorized employees at least annually to ensure the procedures for control of hazardous energy were being followed.  This exposed employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3500
  • · Z (S) $6930

1910.147 C07 I A

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2011
Abate by
Dec 28, 2011
Penalty
Initial $6,930 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation:  (a)  The employer failed to ensure that authorized employees were trained and knowledgeable of the energy control (lock-out/tag-out) procedures.  This exposed employees to amputation hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $6930

1910.178 L04 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 100 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2011
Abate by
Jan 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,960 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4)(iii): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operators performance was not conducted at least once every 3 years.    (a)  The employer failed to re-evaluate forklift operators at least every three years to ensure that they are operating the forklifts in a safe manner.  This exposed employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3960

1910.303 B01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2011
Abate by
Jan 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,970 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that the employer did not ensure the safety of the equipment pursuant to the considerations in sections (i) through (viii) of 29 CR 1910.303(b)(1):    The employer failed to ensure that the mounting and conditions electrical equipment was free form creating a hazard.    (a) The outlet on the north side of presses 201 and 202 was damaged.  This exposed employees to electrical shocks and burns.    (b) Electrical equipment in Cell #3 (location UH-6) was not properly mounted and covered.  This exposed employees to electrical shocks and burns.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $2970

1910.305 G01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2011
Abate by
Dec 21, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,950 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(i): Flexible cords and cables were not approved or conditions of use and location:    (a) The employer did not ensure that an extension cord, plugged into an electrical control panel, used in the facility was approved for the use.  This exposed employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2500
  • · Z (S) $4950

1910.305 G01 IV C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2011
Abate by
Dec 21, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(C): Flexible cords and cables were run through doorways, windows, or similar openings.    (a) The employer failed to ensure that an electrical extension cord was not run through the electrical enclosure's door, which subjected it to damage.  This exposed employees to electrical shock hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.333 A

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2011
Abate by
Jan 5, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,950 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.333(a): Safety-related work practices were not employed to prevent electric shock or other injuries resulting from either direct or indirect electrical contacts, when work was performed near or on equipment or circuits which were or could be energized:  (a) The employer failed to provide appropriate personal protective equipment and compliance for employees when working in the panels for the machinery in the facility.  This exposed employees to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $4950

1910.212 A03 II

Serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2011
Abate by
Jan 27, 2012
Penalty
Initial $9,900 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):    (a) The employer failed to ensure that employees, working at 2000 Airport Road in Waukesha, Wisconsin, were protected from the point of operation and other moving parts on the rear of the #202 hydraulic rubber molding press.  This exposed employees to amputation hazards.    THE ACME MACHELL COMPANY, INC. WAS PREVIOUSLY CITED FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARD, WHICH WAS CONTAINED IN OSHA INSPECTION NUMBER 309357697 (OIS: 81510), CITATION NUMBER 1, ITEM NUMBER 2 AND WAS AFFIRMED AS A FINAL ORDER ON FEBRUARY 15, 2007, WITH RESPECT TO A WORKPLACE LOCATED AT 2000 AIRPORT ROAD IN WAUKESHA, WISCONSIN.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3500
  • · Z (R) $9900

1910.303 G01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 20, 2011
Abate by
Dec 21, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment    (a) The employer failed to ensure that the electrical panels in the facility were kept clear in that; a pallet was in front of an electrical panel, and other material was kept in front of a panel at line #3.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Acme Machell Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 330924655.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.