Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,871Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-30 Last loaded 2026-08-03

OSHA Inspection: PORFIRIO A. SOLANO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PORFIRIO A. SOLANO in 4902 MCNULTY DRIVE, GROVE CITY, OH 43123 (NAICS 238350). OSHA activity number 330926171.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Porfirio a. Solano for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Porfirio a. Solano is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PORFIRIO A. SOLANO
Site address
4902 MCNULTY DRIVE
City
GROVE CITY
State
OH
ZIP
43123
Mailing
816 TIGER DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43228
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238350
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 11, 2011
Abate by
Sep 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.         a.  On the site, employee was working in the rafter area of the structure attempting to repair a damaged truss brace.  The employee was standing on the wood frame when he lost his balance and fell approximately 12 feet to ground.  A general fall protection plan was written without indication of the preparer and did not specifically address making repairs to bracing.  The trusses had been installed and the roof sheathing and shingles were being installed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $4200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330926171.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.