Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SALVADOR PEREZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SALVADOR PEREZ in 4737 BLAIRFIELD DRIVE, WORTHINGTON, OH 43085 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 330926296.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Salvador Perez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Salvador Perez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SALVADOR PEREZ
Site address
4737 BLAIRFIELD DRIVE
City
WORTHINGTON
State
OH
ZIP
43085
Mailing
325 MIDLAND AVENUE, COLUMBUS, OH 43223
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2011
Abate by
Aug 29, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,040 · Current $1,020 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.      a.   At the worksite, the employer did not ensure/enforce that employees utilize eye protection while using a power actuated nail gun to secure shingles, thereby exposing employees to a potential struck-by hazard.      b.   At the worksite, the employer did not ensure/enforce that employees utilize eye protection while using a power skil saw to cut materials such as, but not limited to sheathing board, to replace old board that had been torn out.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $2040

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2011
Abate by
Aug 29, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,550 · Current $1,275 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.      At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees used fall protection while working at heights greater than six feet.  Employees were tearing off old shingles and reshingling the 4 in 12 pitch roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1275
  • — Z (S) $2550

1926.503 C03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2011
Abate by
Sep 12, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,530 · Current $765 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3):      When the employer has reason to believe that any affected employee who has already been trained does not have the understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section, the employer shall retrain each such employee. Circumstances where retraining is required include, but are not limited to, situations where inadequacies in an affected employee\'s knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill:      At the worksite, the employer did not ensure that employees had a clear understanding on recognizing hazards that require the use of fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $765
  • — Z (S) $1530

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2011
Abate by
Aug 29, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,040 · Current $1,020 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1):     When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.  In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support.      At the worksite, the employer did not ensure/enforce that the extension ladder was extended at least three feet above the roof working/walking surface, thereby exposing employees to an approximate 18 foot trip/all hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1020
  • — Z (S) $2040

View Salvador Perez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330926296.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.