Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: RETTEY CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RETTEY CORPORATION in 6420 COUNTY ROAD 800 NORTH, COLCHESTER, IL 62326 (NAICS 336612). OSHA activity number 330927914.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rettey Corporation for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rettey Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RETTEY CORPORATION
Site address
6420 COUNTY ROAD 800 NORTH
City
COLCHESTER
State
IL
ZIP
62326
Mailing
P.O. BOX 261, COLCHESTER, IL 62326
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336612
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2011
Abate by
Aug 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i):     The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    Employees were exposed to potential struck-by hazards while working near other employees operating a powered industrial truck.  The employer did not train employees on the safe operation of powered industrial trucks.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2011
Abate by
Aug 29, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):     One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    Assembly area.  Employees operating the Chicago 100 ton press brake were exposed to amputation hazards.  The space between the ram and die punches was not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $3000

1910.305 B01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2011
Abate by
Aug 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(1)(ii):     Unused openings in boxes, cabinets, or fittings were not effectively closed:    Assembly area.  Employees operating and working near an electrical panel were exposed to shock and burn hazards.  Unused circuit breaker openings were not covered or filled.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.215 A04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2011
Abate by
Aug 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4):     Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:    Assembly area.  Employees using a bench grinder were exposed to nip and caught-in hazards.  The work rests on both grinding wheels were not adjusted to within one-eight inch of the wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.215 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2011
Abate by
Aug 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,600 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2):     Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections:    Assembly area.  Employees using a bench grinder were exposed to nip, caught-in, and struck-by hazards.  The spindle end, nut, and flange of the left grinding wheel were not guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $3600

1910.215 B09

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2011
Abate by
Aug 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9):     The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:    Assembly area.  Employees using a bench grinder were exposed to struck-by hazards.  The grinding wheels were not equipped with tongue guard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (S) $2400

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 330927914.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.