Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: VICTOR BARRIOS

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of VICTOR BARRIOS in 11501 HIAWATHA DRIVE, BOISE, ID 83709 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 330968652.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Victor Barrios for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Victor Barrios is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
VICTOR BARRIOS
Site address
11501 HIAWATHA DRIVE
City
BOISE
State
ID
ZIP
83709
Mailing
2310 LEMHI STREET, BOISE, ID 83705
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2011
Abate by
Aug 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    a) Jobsite: On July 27, 2011 an employee performing sheathing activities using a pnuematic nail gun did not wear any eye protection.      Note) Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $1800

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2011
Abate by
Aug 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor  did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:       a) Jobsite: On July 27, 2011 and times prior thereto, employees were exposed to fall hazards ranging from approximately nine to 18 feet while performing sheathing activities on a six in twelve pitched roof with out a fall protection system in place.       Note) Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $3000

1926.503 A02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2011
Abate by
Aug 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(iii): The employer did not assure that each employee had been trained, as necessary, by a competent person qualified in the use and operation of guardrail systems, personal fall arrest systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used:     a) Jobsite: On July 27, 2011 and times prior thereto, employees and the responsible person on site, did not acknowledge the fall hazards when performing framing activities that included sheathing, and take the appropriate actions to eliminate or minimize these hazards.    Note: Effective September 16, 2011 conventional methods for fall protection, per 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) shall be used.  The alternative methods for fall protection in residential construction as described in STD 03-00-001 will no longer be acceptable.      Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $1,800 · Current $900 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having more than four risers or rising more than 30 inches was not equipped with one stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:     a) Jobsite: On July 27, 2011 and times prior, the interior stairway used for access to and from the second level did not have a stairrail system in place.  Stairway had approximately 16 risers.    Note) Abatement certification IS NOT required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $900
  • · Z (S) $1800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2011
Abate by
Aug 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder:    a) Jobsite: On July 27, 2011 employee(s) were exposed to an approximate nine foot fall hazard when using an extension ladder for access to and from the roof level, which was positioned such that the top rung of the ladder was even with the eave line of the roof.     Note) Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.1060 A01 III

Serious Gravity 5 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2011
Abate by
Aug 22, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1)(iii): The employer did not ensure that each employee using ladders and stairways had been trained by a competent person in the proper construction, use, placement, and care in handling of all stairways and ladders:    a)Jobsite: On July 27, 2011 and times prior thereto, employees and the responsible person on site did not acknowledge the hazard(s) of using a ladder that was not properly positioned and take the appropriate actions to eliminate or minimize the hazard(s).      b) Jobsite: On July 27, 2011 and times prior thereto, employees and the responsible person on site did not acknowledge the hazard(s) of using a stairway with 16 risers without a stairrail system in place along the unprotected side, and take the appropriate actions to eliminate or minimize the hazard(s).    Note) Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 330968652.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.