IXONIA, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: GROWMARK, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GROWMARK, INC. in W1255 MARIETTA AVE, IXONIA, WI 53036 (NAICS 424510). OSHA activity number 330970138.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GROWMARK, INC.
- Site address
- W1255 MARIETTA AVE
- City
- IXONIA
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53036
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 138, IXONIA, WI 53036
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424510
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.272 G02
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 8, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(2): When employees stood on or in stored grain of a depth which posed engulfment hazards, the employer did not equip employees with a body harness with lifeline, a boatswains chair that meets the requirements of subpart D of this part, or an alternative means of protection which demonstrated to prevent the employee from sinking further than waist-deep in the grain: On or about 7/28/11 and 7/29/11 employee(s) were exposed to engulfment hazards during sweep auger set-up and operation inside grain bins, and were not provided with a body harness with lifeline or alternative means of protection to prevent the them from sinking into the stored grain.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3500
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.272 G04
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(4): The employer did not provide equipment for rescue operations which is specifically suited for the bin, silo, or tank being entered: On or about 7/28/11 and 7/29/11 employee(s) were exposed to engulfment hazards during sweep auger set-up and operation inside grain bins, and the employer did not provide rescue equipment suitable for the grain bins entered.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $7000
1910.272 G01 II
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $35,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(1)(ii): All mechanical, electrical, hydraulic, and pneumatic equipment which presents a danger to employees inside grain storage structures were not de-energized and disconnected, locked-out and tagged, blocked-off, or otherwise prevented from operating by other equally effective means or methods: On and before July 25, 2011, employee(s) were exposed to energized sweep augers while cleaning out grain bin #6.
Recent events (2)
- · I (W) $35000
- · Z (W) $70000
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment: The employer had not certified the completion of a hazard assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
1910.147 C05 II D
- Issued
- Jan 19, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 24, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(D): Lockout devices and tagout devices did not indicate the identity of the employee applying the device(s): Tagout devices used by employee(s) during maintenance activities did not contain the identity of the employee applying the tag(s). The list of maintenance activities includes, but is not limited to, preventative maintenance activities and motor replacement.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections at Growmark, INC.
View Growmark, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424510)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 330970138.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.