Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: GROWMARK, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GROWMARK, INC. in W1255 MARIETTA AVE, IXONIA, WI 53036 (NAICS 424510). OSHA activity number 330970138.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Growmark, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Growmark, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GROWMARK, INC.
Site address
W1255 MARIETTA AVE
City
IXONIA
State
WI
ZIP
53036
Mailing
P.O. BOX 138, IXONIA, WI 53036
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424510
Employees
10
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.272 G02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Feb 8, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(2): When employees stood on or in stored grain of a depth which posed engulfment hazards, the employer did not equip employees with a body harness with lifeline, a boatswains chair that meets the requirements of subpart D of this part, or an alternative means of protection which demonstrated to prevent the employee from sinking further than waist-deep in the grain:     On or about 7/28/11 and 7/29/11 employee(s) were exposed to engulfment hazards during sweep auger set-up and operation inside grain bins, and were not provided with a body harness with lifeline or alternative means of protection to prevent the them from sinking into the stored grain.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $3500
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.272 G04

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Feb 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(4):  The employer did not provide equipment for rescue operations which is specifically suited for the bin, silo, or tank being entered:     On or about 7/28/11 and 7/29/11 employee(s) were exposed to engulfment hazards during sweep auger set-up and operation inside grain bins, and the employer did not provide rescue equipment suitable for the grain bins entered.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $7000

1910.272 G01 II

Willful Gravity 10 5 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Feb 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $70,000 · Current $35,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(1)(ii):  All mechanical, electrical, hydraulic, and pneumatic equipment which presents a danger to employees inside grain storage structures were not de-energized and disconnected, locked-out and tagged, blocked-off, or otherwise prevented from operating by other equally effective means or methods:     On and before July 25, 2011, employee(s) were exposed to energized sweep augers while cleaning out grain bin #6.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (W) $35000
  • · Z (W) $70000

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2):  The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:     The employer had not certified the completion of a hazard assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE).
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.147 C05 II D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2012
Abate by
Jan 24, 2012
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(D):  Lockout devices and tagout devices did not indicate the identity of the employee applying the device(s):    Tagout devices used by employee(s) during maintenance activities did not contain the identity of the employee applying the tag(s).  The list of maintenance activities includes, but is not limited to, preventative maintenance activities and motor replacement.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Growmark, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 330970138.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.