LOVES PARK, IL —
OSHA Inspection: FASTENAL COMPANY, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FASTENAL COMPANY, INC. in 5800 INDUSTRIAL, LOVES PARK, IL 61111 (NAICS 332722). OSHA activity number 330970187.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FASTENAL COMPANY, INC.
- Site address
- 5800 INDUSTRIAL
- City
- LOVES PARK
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61111
- Mailing
- 5800 INDUSTRIAL, LOVES PARK, IL 61111
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332722
- Employees
- 49
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Dec 14, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,250 · Current $4,250
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative: The employer's lockout program did not include the setting up tasks on the following machinery: a. Medium Line, 1. Hartffrd Threader, R-15, the guard was not interlocked 2. Robertson Hartford Threader, R-4, the guard was not interlocked b. Large Line, 3. Asahisunic Cold Header, H20, the guard was not interlocked and the machine was not locked out during setup 4. Nedschroeff, BV531, the guard was not interlocked and the machine was not locked out during setup c. Trimmer Area 5. Warren Trimmer, FAC-2, the guard was not interlocked 6. Waterbury Trimmer, FAC-3, the guard was not interlocked d. Batch & Queue Area 7. National Cold Header, H08, the guard was not interlocked 8. National Cold Header, H05, the guard was not interlocked One feasible method of abatement would be to install a positive brake interlock on the guards. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4250
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Dec 14, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,400 · Current $3,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by ingoing nip points: The ingoing nip points on the following machines were not guarded: a. Nedschroef, BV531, wire straightener b. Nedschroef, BL4, wire straightener Abatement certification or documentation is not required for this item.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3400
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Dec 14, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 13, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,400 · Current $3,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): In the tool room, the belt and pulley on the Sunnen Home was not adequately guarded as the operator could reach the ingoing nip point around the guard. Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c)
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3400
1910.335 A01 I
- Issued
- Dec 14, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,400 · Current $3,400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed: Employees performing voltage testing, on voltages up to 480 volt, were not provided with, nor wore, appropriate personal protective equipment, such as, but not limited to: fire retardant clothing, face shield, rubber gloves, etc. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3400
More inspections at Fastenal Company, INC.
View Fastenal Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332722)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330970187.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.