Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FASTENAL COMPANY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FASTENAL COMPANY, INC. in 5800 INDUSTRIAL, LOVES PARK, IL 61111 (NAICS 332722). OSHA activity number 330970187.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fastenal Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fastenal Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5800 INDUSTRIAL
City
LOVES PARK
State
IL
ZIP
61111
Mailing
5800 INDUSTRIAL, LOVES PARK, IL 61111
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332722
Employees
49
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 8 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2011
Abate by
Jan 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $4,250 · Current $4,250
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1):     The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:      The employer's lockout program did not include the setting up tasks on the following machinery:        a. Medium Line,          1. Hartffrd Threader, R-15, the guard was not interlocked         2. Robertson Hartford Threader, R-4, the guard was not interlocked       b. Large Line,         3. Asahisunic Cold Header, H20, the guard was not interlocked and the machine was not locked out during setup         4. Nedschroeff, BV531, the guard was not interlocked and the machine was not locked out during setup            c. Trimmer Area         5. Warren Trimmer, FAC-2, the guard was not interlocked         6. Waterbury Trimmer, FAC-3, the guard was not interlocked       d.  Batch & Queue Area         7. National Cold Header, H08, the guard was not interlocked         8. National Cold Header, H05, the guard was not interlocked    One feasible method of abatement would be to install a positive brake interlock on the guards.    Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4250

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $3,400
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1):     Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by ingoing nip points:      The ingoing nip points on the following machines were not guarded:       a.  Nedschroef, BV531, wire straightener       b.  Nedschroef, BL4, wire straightener    Abatement certification or documentation is not required for this item.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2011
Abate by
Jan 13, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $3,400
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1):     Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    In the tool room, the belt and pulley on the Sunnen Home was not adequately guarded as the operator could reach the ingoing nip point around the guard.    Abatement certification is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c)
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3400

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 14, 2011
Abate by
Jan 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $3,400 · Current $3,400
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i):     Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:    Employees performing voltage testing, on voltages up to 480 volt, were not provided with, nor wore, appropriate personal protective equipment, such as, but not limited to:  fire retardant clothing, face shield, rubber gloves, etc.     Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3400

View Fastenal Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330970187.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.