MILWAUKEE, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: THE WINTERS GROUP, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of THE WINTERS GROUP, LLC in 2604 N. LAKE DR., MILWAUKEE, WI 53211 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 330970211.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE WINTERS GROUP, LLC
- Site address
- 2604 N. LAKE DR.
- City
- MILWAUKEE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53211
- Mailing
- 7772 HARWOOD AVE., WAUWATOSA, WI 53213
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from fallingor flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets. (a) Employer did not ensure that employee was using head protection when working below personnel and equipment. Employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $500
- · C (S) $1800
- · Z (S) $1800
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $600 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operationspresent potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. (a) Employer did not ensure that employee was using safety glasses when conducting work with a power tool. Employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $600
- · C (S) $2400
- · Z (S) $2400
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds shall be fully planked or decked between the frontuprights and the guardrail supports as follows: (a) Employer did not ensure that the scaffold platform was fully planked. Employee was exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $800
- · C (S) $3000
- · Z (S) $3000
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level shall be protected fromfalling to that lower level. Paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section establish the types of fall protection to be provided to the employeeson each type of scaffold. Paragraph (g)(2) of this section addresses fall protection for scaffold erectors and dismantlers.Note to paragraph (g)(1): The fall protection requirements for employees installing suspension scaffold support systems on floors, roofs,and other elevated surfaces are set forth in subpart M of this part. (a) Employer did not ensure that employee was using fall protection when conducting work from a scaffold. Employee was exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $1000
- · C (S) $4200
- · Z (S) $4200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 4, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 7, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,400 · Current $700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. (a) Employer did not ensure that fall protection was being used when conducting work on a residential building. Employer was exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $700
- · C (S) $2400
- · Z (S) $2400
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 330970211.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.