MADISON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: BUCKSHOT EXTERIORS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BUCKSHOT EXTERIORS in 3662 ICE AGE AVE, MADISON, WI 53713 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 330970377.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BUCKSHOT EXTERIORS
- Site address
- 3662 ICE AGE AVE
- City
- MADISON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53713
- Mailing
- 2800 ROYAL AVE SUITE 211, MADISON, WI 53713
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from fallingor flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected with protective helmets. The employer did not ensure that workers performing clean up on the ground under an active roofing site were provided with protective helmets.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operationspresent potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. The employer did not ensure that workers operating pneumatic nail guns were provided with protective eyewear.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. The employer did not ensure that employees performing residential roofing on a 6:12 pitch roof were protected from falling to lower levels.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fallhazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed inorder to minimize these hazards. The employer did not ensure that hazard awareness training was provided for the workers on this site.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $4200
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2011
- Abate by
- Dec 1, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails shall extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder shall be secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support. The employer did not ensure that the ladder to the garage awening and the south side of the roof were extended three feet past the working level or secured to prevent displacement during use.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $4200
- — Z (S) $4200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330970377.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.