ROCKFORD, IL —
OSHA Inspection: LUIS CAMPOS DBA RCH ROOFING
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of LUIS CAMPOS DBA RCH ROOFING in 2205 AUBURN, ROCKFORD, IL 61107 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 330971359.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LUIS CAMPOS DBA RCH ROOFING
- Site address
- 2205 AUBURN
- City
- ROCKFORD
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61107
- Mailing
- 1532 DAISY AVE, ROCKFORD, IL 61107
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 23, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): \r\n\r\nThe employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:\r\n\r\nOn or about August 5, 2011 \u0013 The employer failed to develop and implement a safety and health program to protect employees engaged in construction activities.\r\n\r\nAbatement certification is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(c).\r\n
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $1800
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 24, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b) Note: If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. On or about August 5, 2011 The employer failed to protect employees from a fall hazard while performing roofing duties. The employees were exposed to a 12 foot fall. This item was correct during inspection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100
- — Z (S) $4200
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330971359.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.