Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: STEPHANIE ROMO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of STEPHANIE ROMO in 6620 TIVERTON CIR, SPRINGBORO, OH 45066 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 330972431.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Stephanie Romo for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Stephanie Romo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
STEPHANIE ROMO
Site address
6620 TIVERTON CIR
City
SPRINGBORO
State
OH
ZIP
45066
Mailing
160 FAIRFIELD CT, SPRINGBORO, OH 45066
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
26
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): \r\n\r\nThe employer did not initiate and maintain programs which provided for frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials and equipment to be made by a competent person(s)\r\n\r\nThe employer did not ensure that frequent and regular inspections were conducted in that employees were exposed to multiple safety and health violations.\r\n\r\n
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4900

1926.300 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.300(b)(1): \r\n\r\nPower operated tool(s), designed to accommodate guards, were not equipped with such guards when in use:\r\n\r\nEmployees were utilizing a Quincy gas powered air compressor that was missing the belt and pulley guard while engaged in a residential roofing operation and exposed to an amputation hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4900

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): \r\n\r\nEmployee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph (b)\r\nNote:  If using these systems was infeasible or created a greater hazard, the employer should develop and implement a fall protection plan meeting the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.\r\n\r\nEmployees were engaged in a residential roofing operation and exposed to a fall hazard in excess of 14 feet while not utilizing any type of fall protection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4900

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): \r\n\r\nPortable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access:\r\n\r\nEmployees were utilizing a portable aluminum extension ladder to access the roof and the ladder did not extend 3 foot above the eave line.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4900

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): \r\n\r\nLadder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:\r\n\r\n\r\n1. Employees were utilizing an aluminum extension ladder that was seperated into 2 sections to create 2 seperate ladders. \r\n2. Employees were utilizing an aluminum extension ladder that was sitting on concrete and sitting on the seperated ladder sections unprotected siderails with no rubber feet to prevent displacement.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4900

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330972431.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.