ELKHORN, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: ELKCAST ALUMINUM
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ELKCAST ALUMINUM in 205 EAST CENTRALIA STREET, ELKHORN, WI 53121 (NAICS 331524). OSHA activity number 330973868.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ELKCAST ALUMINUM
- Site address
- 205 EAST CENTRALIA STREET
- City
- ELKHORN
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53121
- Mailing
- 205 EAST CENTRALIA STREET, ELKHORN, WI 53121
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331524
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: Where a machinist was exposed to an 8-hour time weighted average of 87.3 dBA, the employer did not administer a hearing conservation program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2100
- · Z (S) $4200
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Where employees are required to wear Moldex 2300N95 respirators during core making, pouring, and grinding operations, the employer did not establish and implement a respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $3000
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Where employees are required to wear Moldex 2300N95 respirators during core making, pouring, and grinding operations, the employer did not ensure each employee was medically evaluated prior to inital use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Mar 1, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter. Where employees are required to wear Moldex 2300N95 respirators during core making, pouring, and grinding operations, the employer did not ensure employees were fit tested prior to initial use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 10, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: Where employees are required to wear Moldex 2300N95 respirators during core making, pouring, and grinding operations, the employer did not provide employees training.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Machine guarding was not provided to protect operator(s) and other employees from hazard(s) created by: the unguarded portion of the blade. Where employees are using a vertical bandsaw, machine guarding was not provided to protect employees from the unguarded portion of the blade exposing employees to amputation hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $3000
More inspections at Elkcast Aluminum
View Elkcast Aluminum's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331524)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330973868.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.