Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: PAUL CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of PAUL CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES, INC. in 4800 MAPLE LEAF CIRCLE, GREENFIELD, WI 53220 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 330975251.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Paul Crandall and Associates, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Paul Crandall and Associates, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4800 MAPLE LEAF CIRCLE
City
GREENFIELD
State
WI
ZIP
53220
Mailing
1645 N. PORT WASHINGTON RD., GRAFTON, WI 53024
Inspection type
Programmed Related (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 20, 2011
Abate by
Sep 21, 2011
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,175 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1):     Employees shall be provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operationspresent potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    (a) Employer did not ensure that employee was using eye protection when conducting work with a power tool. Employee was exposed to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1175
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 20, 2011
Abate by
Sep 21, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $1,875 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1):     Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level shall be protected fromfalling to that lower level. Paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section establish the types of fall protection to be provided to the employeeson each type of scaffold. Paragraph (g)(2) of this section addresses fall protection for scaffold erectors and dismantlers.Note to paragraph (g)(1): The fall protection requirements for employees installing suspension scaffold support systems on floors, roofs,and other elevated surfaces are set forth in subpart M of this part.    (a) Employer did not ensure that an employee was using fall protection when conducting work from a ladder jack scaffold. Employee was exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1875
  • · Z (S) $4200

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 20, 2011
Abate by
Sep 21, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,225 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet(1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provisionin paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it isinfeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets therequirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fallprotection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complieswith 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.      (a) Employer did not ensure that an employee was using fall protection when conducing roofing work on a residential building. Employee was exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1225
  • · Z (S) $3000

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 20, 2011
Abate by
Oct 12, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $1,225 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1):     The employer shall provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fallhazards. The program shall enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and shall train each employee in the procedures to be followed inorder to minimize these hazards.    (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were trained in recognizing fall hazards and implementing fall protection. Employees, who primarily spoke spanish, were not trained in fall protection. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1225
  • · Z (S) $3000

View Paul Crandall and Associates, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 330975251.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.