MADISON, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: TRILLIUM SOLID SURFACE, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TRILLIUM SOLID SURFACE, LLC in 4618 TOMPKINS DRIVE, MADISON, WI 53716 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 330975889.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TRILLIUM SOLID SURFACE, LLC
- Site address
- 4618 TOMPKINS DRIVE
- City
- MADISON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53716
- Mailing
- 4618 TOMPKINS DRIVE, MADISON, WI 53716
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 337110
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Dec 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms or service rooms were not kept clean and orderly or in a sanitary condition. The employer did not keep the production area free of accumulation of combustible dust.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1260
- · Z (S) $4200
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Where employee(s) are overexposed to particulates not otherwise regulated, the employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did not ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter Where employee(s) are overexposed to particulates not otherwise regulated, the employer did not ensure that employees were fit tested prior to initial use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace: Where employee(s) are overexposed to particulates not otherwise regulated, the employer did not provide training to employees prior to requiring employees to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy. An outlet in the production area of the workplace had a broken faceplate.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (S) $1800
1910.1000 A02
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $1,260 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of Particles not otherwise requlated (Total Dust) listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration of 15 mg/m^3: A sander was exposed to 19.5 mg/m^3 of total dust which is 1.3 times the limit of 15 mg/m^3. This limit is established to prevent irritation of the eyes, skin, throat, and upper respiratory system.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1260
- · Z (S) $4200
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Jun 5, 2013
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): A sander was exposed to 19.5 mg/m^3 of total dust which is 1.3 times the limit of 15 mg/m^3.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminants chemical state and physical form: Where a sander was overexposed to total dust, the employer did not evaluate respiratory hazards in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for respirator use: Where employee(s) are overexposed to particulates not otherwise regulated, the employer did not develop a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $3600
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Apr 2, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $3,000 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: Where employees are working with chemicals including, but not limited to: LG HI-MACS Acrylic Solid Surface, the employer did not develop a hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $900
- · Z (S) $3000
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jan 20, 2012
- Abate by
- Feb 3, 2012
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: Where employees are working with chemicals including, but not limited to: LG HI-MACS Acrylic Solid Surface, the employer did not provide training on the hazards.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 337110)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330975889.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.