Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ADR CONSTRUCTION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ADR CONSTRUCTION in 607 N. LEE STREET, BLOOMINGTON, IL 61702 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 330976853.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ADR Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ADR Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ADR CONSTRUCTION
Site address
607 N. LEE STREET
City
BLOOMINGTON
State
IL
ZIP
61702
Mailing
1679 840TH AVENUE, LINCOLN, IL 62656
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2011
Abate by
Sep 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $3,000 · Current $3,000
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): \r\n\r\nThe employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:\r\n\r\nEmployees removing roofing material were exposed to a fall hazard and the employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to control and eliminate hazards found at the jobsite.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3000

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2011
Abate by
Sep 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): \\r\\n\\r\\nThe employer did not provide frequent and regular inspections of the job site, materials, and equipment by a competent person:\\r\\n\\r\\nEmployees removing roofing material were exposed to a fall hazard and a competent person had not performed frequent and regular safety inspections of the construction site to identify and eliminate the worksite hazards.\\r\\n
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2011
Abate by
Sep 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):     Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were other provisions of paragraph (b) of this section used to provide an alternative fall protection measure:    Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 12.6 feet to the ground below while removing roofing material and no fall protection was provided.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2011
Abate by
Sep 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): \r\n\r\nThe employer did not provide a training program for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards which enables each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and train each employee in the procedures to be followed in order to minimize the hazards:\r\n\r\nEmployees removing roofing material were exposed to a fall hazard approximately 12.6 feet to the ground below and the employees were not provided training which would have enabled them to recognize the hazards of falling and provided them with the procedures to follow to minimize the hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 9, 2011
Abate by
Sep 16, 2011
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1):     The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section by preparing a written certification record containing the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee:    The employer did not maintain evidence of the required training for each employee who might be exposed to fall hazards.  There was no written documentation that included the employees name, date of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employee.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View ADR Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330976853.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.