SUGARCREEK, OH —
OSHA Inspection: SCENIC WOOD PRODUCTS
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of SCENIC WOOD PRODUCTS in 10143 COPPERHEAD ROAD, SUGARCREEK, OH 44681 (NAICS 321920). OSHA activity number 330977091.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SCENIC WOOD PRODUCTS
- Site address
- 10143 COPPERHEAD ROAD
- City
- SUGARCREEK
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44681
- Mailing
- 10143 COPPERHEAD ROAD, SUGARCREEK, OH 44681
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321920
- Employees
- 65
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $2,380 · Current $1,666 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): \n\nWhen information indicates that any employee\'s exposure may equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer shall develop and implement a monitoring program.\n\na. The employer had not developed and implemented a monitoring program for employees working in the block machine area. An employee operating the block machine was exposed to continuous noise at 106.1 dose percent which exceeded the action level (AL) of 50 percent, an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee\'s eight hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.4 dBA during the 475 minute sampling period on August 24, 2011. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 5 minutes not sampled. \n\nb. The employer had not developed and implemented a monitoring program for employees working in the block machine area. An employee operating the block machine was exposed to continuous noise at 110.7 dose percent which exceeded the action level (AL) of 50 percent, an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee\'s eight hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.7 dBA during the 477 minute sampling period on August 24, 2011. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 3 minutes not sampled. \n\nc. The employer had not developed and implemented a monitoring program for employees working in the block machine area. An employee operating the block machine was exposed to continuous noise at 89.66 dose percent which exceeded the action level (AL) of 50 percent, an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee\'s eight hour TWA sound level was approximately 89.2 dBA during the 473 minute sampling period on August 24, 2011. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 7 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1666
- — Z (S) $2380
1910.95 G01
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): \\n\\nThe employer shall establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided in this paragraph by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels.\\n\\na. The employer had not developed and implemented an audiometric testing program for employees working in the block machine area. An employee operating the block machine was exposed to continuous noise at 106.1 dose percent which exceeded the action level (AL) of 50 percent, an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee\\\'s eight hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.4 dBA during the 475 minute sampling period on August 24, 2011. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 5 minutes not sampled. \\n\\nb. The employer had not developed and implemented an audiometric testing program for employees working in the block machine area. An employee operating the block machine was exposed to continuous noise at 110.7 dose percent which exceeded the action level (AL) of 50 percent, an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee\\\\\\\'s eight hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.7 dBA during the 477 minute sampling period on August 24, 2011. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 3 minutes not sampled. \\n\\nc. The employer had not developed and implemented an audiometric testing program for employees working in the block machine area. An employee operating the block machine was exposed to continuous noise at 89.66 dose percent which exceeded the action level (AL) of 50 percent, an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee\\\\\\\'s eight hour TWA sound level was approximately 89.2 dBA during the 473 minute sampling period on August 24, 2011. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 7 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 I03
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(3): \\\\n\\\\nEmployees shall be given the opportunity to select their hearing protectors from a variety of suitable hearing protectors provided by the employer.\\\\n\\\\na. The employer did not provide multiple options for hearing protectors for employees working in the block machine area. An employee operating the block machine was exposed to continuous noise at 106.1 dose percent which exceeded the action level (AL) of 50 percent, an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee\\\\\\\'s eight hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.4 dBA during the 475 minute sampling period on August 24, 2011. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 5 minutes not sampled. \\\\n\\\\nb. The employer did not provide multiple options for hearing protectors for employees working in the block machine area. An employee operating the block machine was exposed to continuous noise at 110.7 dose percent which exceeded the action level (AL) of 50 percent, an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee\\\\\\\'s eight hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.7 dBA during the 477 minute sampling period on August 24, 2011. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 3 minutes not sampled.\\\\n\\\\nc. The employer did not provide multiple options for hearing protectors for employees working in the block machine area. An employee operating the block machine was exposed to continuous noise at 89.66 dose percent which exceeded the action level (AL) of 50 percent, an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee\\\\\\\'s eight hour TWA sound level was approximately 89.2 dBA during the 473 minute sampling period on August 24, 2011. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 7 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 K01
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2011
- Abate by
- Sep 29, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): \\n\\nThe employer shall train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of this section. The employer shall institute a training program and ensure employee participation in the program.\\n\\na. The employer had not developed and implemented a training program for employees working in the block machine area. An employee operating the block machine was exposed to continuous noise at 106.1 dose percent which exceeded the action level (AL) of 50 percent, an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee\\\\\\\'s eight hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.4 dBA during the 475 minute sampling period on August 24, 2011. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 5 minutes not sampled. b. The employer had not developed and implemented a training program for employees working in the block machine area. An employee operating the block machine was exposed to continuous noise at 110.7 dose percent which exceeded the action level (AL) of 50 percent, an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee\\\\\\\'s eight hour TWA sound level was approximately 90.7 dBA during the 477 minute sampling period on August 24, 2011. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 3 minutes not sampled. \\\\n\\\\nc. The employer had not developed and implemented a training program for employees working in the block machine area. An employee operating the block machine was exposed to continuous noise at 89.66 dose percent which exceeded the action level (AL) of 50 percent, an eight hour time weighted average (TWA) sound level of 85 dBA. The employee\\\\\\\'s eight hour TWA sound level was approximately 89.2 dBA during the 473 minute sampling period on August 24, 2011. Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 7 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Scenic Wood Products
View Scenic Wood Products's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321920)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 330977091.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.